<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mjimenez47</id>
	<title>MILL Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Mjimenez47"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Mjimenez47"/>
	<updated>2026-10-17T05:25:16Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.7</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Stereolithography_(SLA)&amp;diff=39377</id>
		<title>Stereolithography (SLA)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Stereolithography_(SLA)&amp;diff=39377"/>
		<updated>2025-07-23T16:22:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Prusa SL1 Resin Printer and CW1 Curing &amp;amp; Waching Machine [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/resin-printer/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
!&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;FormLabs 3+ resin printer&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:ResinPrinter-052621.png|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Resin Types&#039;&#039;&#039;: Prusa Tough (Orange, Black)&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Resin Types:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rigid 4000, castable wax, clear, &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLADiagram.PNG|thumb|left|Diagram of the key parts of a typical desktop SLA printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
Stereolithography (SLA) belongs to a family of additive manufacturing technologies known as vat photopolymerization, commonly known as resin 3D printing&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Formlabs&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Formlabs. (n.d.). The Ultimate Guide to Stereolithography (SLA) 3D Printing. https://formlabs.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-stereolithography-sla-3d-printing/.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. These machines are all built around the same principle, using a light source—a laser or projector—to cure liquid resin into hardened plastic. The main physical differentiation lies in the arrangement of the core components, such as the light source, the build platform, and the resin tank. SLA 3D printers use light-reactive thermoset materials called “resin.” When SLA resins are exposed to certain wavelengths of light, short molecular chains join together, polymerizing monomers and oligomers into solidified rigid or flexible geometries. SLA parts have the highest resolution and accuracy, the sharpest details, and the smoothest surface finishes of all 3D printing technologies, but the main benefit of the stereolithography lies in its versatility. Material manufacturers have created innovative SLA resin formulations with a wide range of optical, mechanical, and thermal properties to match those of standard, engineering, and industrial thermoplastics.&lt;br /&gt;
== Principle ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLAPrinciple.PNG|thumb|left|500px|Diagram showing how SLA printing builds layers]]&lt;br /&gt;
When the process starts, an ultraviolet laser “draws” the first layer of the print into the photosensitive resin&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;All3DP&amp;quot;&amp;gt; All3DP. (2020, September 16). Stereolithography / SLA 3D Printing – Simply Explained. https://all3dp.com/2/stereolithography-3d-printing-simply-explained/. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Wherever the laser hits, the liquid solidifies. The laser is directed to the appropriate coordinates by a computer-controlled mirror. Most desktop SLA printers work upside-down. That is, the laser is pointed up to the build platform, which starts low and is incrementally raised. After the first layer, the platform is raised according to the layer thickness (typically about 0.1 mm) and the additional resin is allowed to flow below the already-printed portion. The laser then solidifies the next cross-section, and the process is repeated until the whole part is complete. The resin that is not touched by the laser remains in the vat and can be reused. After finishing the material polymerization, the platform rises out of the tank and the excess resin is drained. At the end of the process, the model is removed from the platform, washed of excess resin, and then placed in a UV oven for final curing. Post-print curing enables objects to reach the highest possible strength and become more stable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why Choose SLA 3D Printing? ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLAvSFDM.PNG|thumb|While FDM 3D printed parts tend to have visible layer lines and might show inaccuracies around complex features, parts printed on SLA machines have sharp edges, a smooth surface finish, and minimal visible layer lines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Isotropy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Because 3D printing creates parts one layer at a time, completed prints may have variations in strength based on orientation of the part relative to the printing process, with different properties in X, Y, and Z axes. Extrusion-based 3D printing processes like fused deposition modeling (FDM) are known for being anisotropic due to layer-to-layer differences created by the print process. This anisotropy limits the usefulness of FDM for certain applications, or requires more adjustments on the part geometry side to compensate for it. In contrast, SLA resin 3D printers create highly isotropic parts. Achieving part isotropy is based on a number of factors that can be tightly controlled by integrating material chemistry with the print process. During printing, resin components form covalent bonds, but layer to layer, the part remains in a semi-reacted “green state.” While in the green state, the resin retains polymerizable groups that can form bonds across layers, imparting isotropy and watertightness to the part upon final cure. On the molecular level, there is no difference between X, Y, or Z planes. This results in parts with predictable mechanical performance critical for applications like jigs and fixtures, end-use parts, and functional prototyping.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Watertightness ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA printed objects are continuous, whether producing geometries with solid features or internal channels. This watertightness is important for engineering and manufacturing applications where air or fluid flow must be controlled and predictable. Engineers and designers use the watertightness of SLA printers to solve air and fluid flow challenges for automotive uses, biomedical research, and to validate part designs for consumer products like kitchen appliances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accuracy and Precision ===&lt;br /&gt;
Industries from dental to manufacturing depend on SLA 3D printing to repeatedly create accurate, precise components. For a print process to produce accurate and precise parts, multiple factors must be tightly controlled. The combination of the heated resin tank and the closed build environment provides almost identical conditions for each print. Better accuracy is also a function of lower printing temperature compared to thermoplastic-based technologies that melt the raw material. Because stereolithography uses light instead of heat, the printing process takes place at close to room temperature, and printed parts don&#039;t suffer from thermal expansion and contraction artifacts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fine Features and Smooth Surface Finish ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA printers are considered the gold standard for smooth surface finish, with appearances comparable to traditional manufacturing methods like machining, injection molding, and extrusion. This surface quality is ideal for applications that require a flawless finish and also helps reduce post-processing time, since parts can easily be sanded, polished, and painted. In comparison, FDM and SLS printers typically print Z-axis layers at 100 to 300 microns. However, a part printed at 100 microns on an FDM or SLS printer looks different from a part printed at 100 microns on an SLA printer. SLA prints have a smoother surface finish right out of the printer, because the outermost perimeter walls are straight, and the newly printed layer interacts with the previous layer, smoothing out the staircase effect. FDM prints tend to have clearly visible layers, whereas SLS has a grainy surface from the sintered powder. The smallest possible detail is also much finer on SLA, given 85 micron laser spot size on a high end desktop model, in comparison with 350 microns on industrial SLS printers, and 250–800 micron nozzles on FDM machines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Material Versatility ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA resins have the benefit of a wide range of formulation configurations: materials can be soft or hard, heavily filled with secondary materials like glass and ceramic, or imbued with mechanical properties like high heat deflection temperature or impact resistance. Material range from industry-specific, like dentures, to those that closely match final materials for prototyping, formulated to withstand extensive testing and perform under stress. In some cases, its this combination of versatility and functionality that leads to companies to initially bring resin 3D printing in-house. After finding one application solved by a specific functional material, it’s usually not long before more possibilities are uncovered, and the printer becomes a tool for leveraging the diverse capabilities of various materials.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Index.php?title=Category:Equipment|proc]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Stereolithography_(SLA)&amp;diff=39376</id>
		<title>Stereolithography (SLA)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Stereolithography_(SLA)&amp;diff=39376"/>
		<updated>2025-07-23T16:13:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Prusa SL1 Resin Printer and CW1 Curing &amp;amp; Waching Machine [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/resin-printer/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
!FormLabs 3+ resin printer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:ResinPrinter-052621.png|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Resin Types&#039;&#039;&#039;: Prusa Tough (Orange, Black)&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Resin Types:&#039;&#039;&#039; Rigid 4000, castable wax, clear, &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLADiagram.PNG|thumb|left|Diagram of the key parts of a typical desktop SLA printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
Stereolithography (SLA) belongs to a family of additive manufacturing technologies known as vat photopolymerization, commonly known as resin 3D printing&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Formlabs&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Formlabs. (n.d.). The Ultimate Guide to Stereolithography (SLA) 3D Printing. https://formlabs.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-stereolithography-sla-3d-printing/.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. These machines are all built around the same principle, using a light source—a laser or projector—to cure liquid resin into hardened plastic. The main physical differentiation lies in the arrangement of the core components, such as the light source, the build platform, and the resin tank. SLA 3D printers use light-reactive thermoset materials called “resin.” When SLA resins are exposed to certain wavelengths of light, short molecular chains join together, polymerizing monomers and oligomers into solidified rigid or flexible geometries. SLA parts have the highest resolution and accuracy, the sharpest details, and the smoothest surface finishes of all 3D printing technologies, but the main benefit of the stereolithography lies in its versatility. Material manufacturers have created innovative SLA resin formulations with a wide range of optical, mechanical, and thermal properties to match those of standard, engineering, and industrial thermoplastics.&lt;br /&gt;
== Principle ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLAPrinciple.PNG|thumb|left|500px|Diagram showing how SLA printing builds layers]]&lt;br /&gt;
When the process starts, an ultraviolet laser “draws” the first layer of the print into the photosensitive resin&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;All3DP&amp;quot;&amp;gt; All3DP. (2020, September 16). Stereolithography / SLA 3D Printing – Simply Explained. https://all3dp.com/2/stereolithography-3d-printing-simply-explained/. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Wherever the laser hits, the liquid solidifies. The laser is directed to the appropriate coordinates by a computer-controlled mirror. Most desktop SLA printers work upside-down. That is, the laser is pointed up to the build platform, which starts low and is incrementally raised. After the first layer, the platform is raised according to the layer thickness (typically about 0.1 mm) and the additional resin is allowed to flow below the already-printed portion. The laser then solidifies the next cross-section, and the process is repeated until the whole part is complete. The resin that is not touched by the laser remains in the vat and can be reused. After finishing the material polymerization, the platform rises out of the tank and the excess resin is drained. At the end of the process, the model is removed from the platform, washed of excess resin, and then placed in a UV oven for final curing. Post-print curing enables objects to reach the highest possible strength and become more stable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why Choose SLA 3D Printing? ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SLAvSFDM.PNG|thumb|While FDM 3D printed parts tend to have visible layer lines and might show inaccuracies around complex features, parts printed on SLA machines have sharp edges, a smooth surface finish, and minimal visible layer lines.]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Isotropy ===&lt;br /&gt;
Because 3D printing creates parts one layer at a time, completed prints may have variations in strength based on orientation of the part relative to the printing process, with different properties in X, Y, and Z axes. Extrusion-based 3D printing processes like fused deposition modeling (FDM) are known for being anisotropic due to layer-to-layer differences created by the print process. This anisotropy limits the usefulness of FDM for certain applications, or requires more adjustments on the part geometry side to compensate for it. In contrast, SLA resin 3D printers create highly isotropic parts. Achieving part isotropy is based on a number of factors that can be tightly controlled by integrating material chemistry with the print process. During printing, resin components form covalent bonds, but layer to layer, the part remains in a semi-reacted “green state.” While in the green state, the resin retains polymerizable groups that can form bonds across layers, imparting isotropy and watertightness to the part upon final cure. On the molecular level, there is no difference between X, Y, or Z planes. This results in parts with predictable mechanical performance critical for applications like jigs and fixtures, end-use parts, and functional prototyping.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Watertightness ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA printed objects are continuous, whether producing geometries with solid features or internal channels. This watertightness is important for engineering and manufacturing applications where air or fluid flow must be controlled and predictable. Engineers and designers use the watertightness of SLA printers to solve air and fluid flow challenges for automotive uses, biomedical research, and to validate part designs for consumer products like kitchen appliances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accuracy and Precision ===&lt;br /&gt;
Industries from dental to manufacturing depend on SLA 3D printing to repeatedly create accurate, precise components. For a print process to produce accurate and precise parts, multiple factors must be tightly controlled. The combination of the heated resin tank and the closed build environment provides almost identical conditions for each print. Better accuracy is also a function of lower printing temperature compared to thermoplastic-based technologies that melt the raw material. Because stereolithography uses light instead of heat, the printing process takes place at close to room temperature, and printed parts don&#039;t suffer from thermal expansion and contraction artifacts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fine Features and Smooth Surface Finish ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA printers are considered the gold standard for smooth surface finish, with appearances comparable to traditional manufacturing methods like machining, injection molding, and extrusion. This surface quality is ideal for applications that require a flawless finish and also helps reduce post-processing time, since parts can easily be sanded, polished, and painted. In comparison, FDM and SLS printers typically print Z-axis layers at 100 to 300 microns. However, a part printed at 100 microns on an FDM or SLS printer looks different from a part printed at 100 microns on an SLA printer. SLA prints have a smoother surface finish right out of the printer, because the outermost perimeter walls are straight, and the newly printed layer interacts with the previous layer, smoothing out the staircase effect. FDM prints tend to have clearly visible layers, whereas SLS has a grainy surface from the sintered powder. The smallest possible detail is also much finer on SLA, given 85 micron laser spot size on a high end desktop model, in comparison with 350 microns on industrial SLS printers, and 250–800 micron nozzles on FDM machines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Material Versatility ===&lt;br /&gt;
SLA resins have the benefit of a wide range of formulation configurations: materials can be soft or hard, heavily filled with secondary materials like glass and ceramic, or imbued with mechanical properties like high heat deflection temperature or impact resistance. Material range from industry-specific, like dentures, to those that closely match final materials for prototyping, formulated to withstand extensive testing and perform under stress. In some cases, its this combination of versatility and functionality that leads to companies to initially bring resin 3D printing in-house. After finding one application solved by a specific functional material, it’s usually not long before more possibilities are uncovered, and the printer becomes a tool for leveraging the diverse capabilities of various materials.&lt;br /&gt;
[[index.php?title=Category:Equipment|proc]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Fused_Filament_Fabrication_(FFF)&amp;diff=39365</id>
		<title>Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Fused_Filament_Fabrication_(FFF)&amp;diff=39365"/>
		<updated>2025-07-08T14:04:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Hyrel System 30M (FFF) [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/hyrel/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Prusa i3 MK3S-MK4S (FFF) [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/prusa-i3/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:Hyrel-052621.png|center|270px]]||[[File:PrusaPrinter-052621.png|center|270px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Slicer Software&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Slic3r (built-in)||PrusaSlicer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Build Volume&#039;&#039;&#039;:||22.5(L) x 20(W) x 20(H) cm||25(L) x 21(W) x 21(H) cm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Extruders&#039;&#039;&#039;:||?||BondTech gears with E3D V6 hotend (max. 285°C)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Supported Filament&#039;&#039;&#039;:||PLA, ABS, PEEK ||PLA, PETG, ASA, ABS, PC, CPE, PVA/BVOH, PVB, HIPS, PP, Flex, nGen, Nylon, Carbon filled, Woodfill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Filament Diameter&#039;&#039;&#039;:||1.75mm||1.75mm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Layer Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:||?||0.05 - 0.35 mm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Extrusion Speed&#039;&#039;&#039;:||?||?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;XY Precision&#039;&#039;&#039;:||5 µ&#039;&#039;m&#039;&#039;||?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Z Precision&#039;&#039;&#039;:||1 µ&#039;&#039;m&#039;&#039;||?&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) is a technology that enables the creation of prototypes in short timeframes by moving an extrusion nozzle horizontally and vertically&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;FDM 3D printing - Fused Deposition Modeling also know as FFF&#039;&#039;. Tractus3D. (2020, July 16). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://tractus3d.com/knowledge/learn-3d-printing/fdm-3d-printing/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It is also known as fused deposition modeling (FDM) which is trademarked by Stratasys. These machines are all built with a heated nozzle that extrudes thermoplastic filaments onto a build plate where the cross-sectional layers are applied individually to create the 3D object. The differences in the printers are the types of nozzles, the maximum heat of the nozzles and the bed, the size of the build plate, the size of filament allowed, and whether the printer is enclosed or not. These differences will impact the kind of material that can be printed and the size of the object as well as the detailing of the object. FFF 3D printers use thermoplastic filaments to build up layers of 3D objects by cooling the plastic so that it forms bonds with the previous layer. FFF printing has a larger variety of materials and colors and blends and requires little to no cleaning with lower material and machining costs.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDM_printing_diagram.png|thumb|right|300px|1 - nozzle,                                                                2 - filament layers,                                                        3 - build plate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Gringer / Wikimedia Commons / CC0 1.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Principle==&lt;br /&gt;
The process for FFF printing starts with a digital design being uploaded to the computer on the printer. The computer then translates the object from the design into coordinates for the base and nozzle to follow. The nozzle is heated which melts the filaments then the nozzle extrudes the melted plastic onto the base plate layer by layer. As the nozzle moves, the plastic solidifies to form the object in 3 dimensions. The larger and the more complicated the object, the longer the process takes. The detail on finished prints is limited by the sizing of the nozzle, but it does not produce the finest of details. FFF printers work with the nozzle above the bed plate. Some printers have the nozzle move in both x and y directions (Ultimaker); some nozzles move in x and z directions (Prusa), and some move in the y direction only (Hyrel). Whichever direction the nozzle does not move, the bed moves. The filament needs to bond to a previous layer in order for the layers to be properly formed. This means that if the angle is greater than 45 degrees, support material is needed to build the layers. This computer knows to generate the supports for the object, and support material is removable after the print is finished. At the end of the process, the object can be removed from the build plate then the supports should be removed and the print is done.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDM_driver.png|thumb|right|300px|1 - filament, 2 - extruder, 3 - nozzle, 4 - print, 5 - build plate&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Jona / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why Choose FDM/FFF 3D Printing?==&lt;br /&gt;
===Material Variety===&lt;br /&gt;
FFF printing has a wide variety of materials available. There are composite blends and flexible materials along with many more options. Some materials include PLA, ABS, PETG, PEI, PEEK, TPU, HIPS, nGEN, Nylon, POM, Carbon Fiber PLA, and wood composites. These materials can also be used simultaneously which offers a wide range of flexibility in the process. There have also been an abundance of colors created which increases the variety in prints&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;FDM vs. SLA: Compare the Two Most Popular Types of 3D Printers&#039;&#039;. Formlabs. (n.d.). &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;https://formlabs.com/blog/fdm-vs-sla-compare-types-of-3d-printers/&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Prototyping===&lt;br /&gt;
FFF printed prototypes are generally ideal because they can undergo heat, chemical stress, and mechanical stress with little to no problems. The printing process also produces detailed prototypes that can be used to ensure fit and form for the real parts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Low Machine and Equipment Costs===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FFF printing is cheaper than other 3D printing methods. The materials used are less costly than other printers along with the printers being more cost efficient. The basic printers can cost a few hundred dollars while the better printers can cost anywhere from $2,000-$8,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===No cleaning===&lt;br /&gt;
FFF processing creates a product that is ready for use immediately after print, unless there are supports which need to be removed before use. This makes the method efficient and less messy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Build Volume&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Filament Types&#039;&#039;&#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[index.php?title=Category:Equipment|proc]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39364</id>
		<title>Category:Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39364"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T20:29:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See our [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/equipment/list/ equipment status list and SOPs].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Learn more about our [https://mill.mse.gatech.edu/equipment/about/ Equipment Teams].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Characterization==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Digital Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Stereomicroscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Inverted Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Profilometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Spectroscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Plasma Sputtering]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Measurement==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mechanical Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Microhardness Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moisture Analyzer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Camera]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UV-Vis Spectrophotometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Contact Angle Goniometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Analytical Balance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brookfield DV2T Viscometer|Viscometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pycnometer&lt;br /&gt;
*Abrasion Tester&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Squidstat]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Processing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3D Printing ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)]]/Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Hyrel System 30M&lt;br /&gt;
** Prusa i3 MK3S&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stereolithography (SLA)]] Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Prusa Resin Printer&lt;br /&gt;
** Formlabs resin printer&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filament Recycling]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Granulator&lt;br /&gt;
** Filament Extruder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science of Art ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Hot Plates&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/vinyl-cutter/ Vinyl Cutter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Textiles ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sewing Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Embroidery Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Screen Printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heat Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Vacuum Former&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liquid Nitrogen Generator]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ceramics Lab (Love 369) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Uniaxial Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ball Mill]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vibratory Tumbler&lt;br /&gt;
* Sieve Shaker&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns|Electric Furnaces]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39363</id>
		<title>Category:Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39363"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T19:28:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See our [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/equipment/list/ equipment status list and SOPs].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Learn more about our [https://mill.mse.gatech.edu/equipment/about/ Equipment Teams].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Characterization==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Digital Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Stereomicroscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Inverted Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Profilometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Spectroscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Plasma Sputtering]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Measurement==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mechanical Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Microhardness Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moisture Analyzer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Camera]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UV-Vis Spectrophotometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Contact Angle Goniometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Analytical Balance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brookfield DV2T Viscometer|Viscometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pycnometer&lt;br /&gt;
*Abrasion Tester&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Squidstat]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Processing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3D Printing ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)]]/Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Ultimaker 2+&lt;br /&gt;
** Hyrel System 30M&lt;br /&gt;
** Prusa i3 MK3S&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimension SST 1200es&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stereolithography (SLA)]] Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Resin Printer&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filament Recycling]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Granulator&lt;br /&gt;
** Filament Extruder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science of Art ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Hot Plates&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/vinyl-cutter/ Vinyl Cutter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Textiles ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sewing Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Embroidery Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Screen Printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heat Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Vacuum Former&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liquid Nitrogen Generator]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ceramics Lab (Love 369) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Uniaxial Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ball Mill]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vibratory Tumbler&lt;br /&gt;
* Sieve Shaker&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns|Electric Furnaces]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Gravimetric_Buoyancy&amp;diff=39362</id>
		<title>Gravimetric Buoyancy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Gravimetric_Buoyancy&amp;diff=39362"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T19:27:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: Mjimenez47 moved page Gravimetric Buoyancy to Analytical Balance over redirect: Misspelled title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Analytical Balance]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Analytical_Balance&amp;diff=39361</id>
		<title>Analytical Balance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Analytical_Balance&amp;diff=39361"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T19:27:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: Mjimenez47 moved page Gravimetric Buoyancy to Analytical Balance over redirect: Misspelled title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | VWR Analytical Balance [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/analytical-balance/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:VWRBalance-052621.png|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Mass Range&#039;&#039;&#039;: 10mg - 160g&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Precision&#039;&#039;&#039;: 0.1mg (0.0001g)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The VWR Balances provide maximum weighing performance and are used for the accurate weighing of samples and precipitates. They are designed to measure small masses in the sub-milligram range. They are useful for determining density via the Archimedes method and can be used to take measurements over time.  For example, they can be used to measure the rate at which a liquid evaporates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Archimedes Method ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Archimedes method is used to determine the density of samples without needing to measure the sample’s physical dimensions. The difference in mass between the dry and submerged samples is equal to the volume of water displaced by the submerged sample because water has a density of ~1 gm/cm³. The density of the sample is found by taking the dry mass and dividing it by this volume. This method should only be used with samples that will not dissolve in water, as it will not work properly with water-soluble samples. The formula used is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \rho = \frac{m_d}{V} = \frac{m_d}{m_d-m_w} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \rho  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is density (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; g/cm^3 &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;),  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; V  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is volume, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; m_d &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the dry mass, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; m_w &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the submerged (&amp;quot;wet&amp;quot;) mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a solvent other than water is used, or you need to take very precise density measurements based on liquid temperature, the formula becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \rho = \frac{m_d}{V} \frac{m_d}{m_d-m_w}*\rho_s &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \rho_s  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the density of the solvent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|meas]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39360</id>
		<title>Category:Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39360"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T19:13:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See our [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/equipment/list/ equipment status list and SOPs].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Learn more about our [https://mill.mse.gatech.edu/equipment/about/ Equipment Teams].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Characterization==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Digital Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Stereomicroscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Inverted Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Profilometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Spectroscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Plasma Sputtering]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Measurement==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mechanical Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Microhardness Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moisture Analyzer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Camera]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UV-Vis Spectrophotometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Contact Angle Goniometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Analytical Balance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brookfield DV2T Viscometer|Viscometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pycnometer&lt;br /&gt;
*Abrasion Tester&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Squidstat]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Processing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3D Printing ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)]]/Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Ultimaker 2+&lt;br /&gt;
** Hyrel System 30M&lt;br /&gt;
** Prusa i3 MK3S&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimension SST 1200es&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stereolithography (SLA)]] Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Resin Printer&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filament Recycling]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Granulator&lt;br /&gt;
** Filament Extruder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science of Art ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Hot Plates&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/vinyl-cutter/ Vinyl Cutter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Textiles ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sewing Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Embroidery Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Screen Printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heat Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Vacuum Former&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liquid Nitrogen Generator]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ceramics Lab (Love 369) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Uniaxial Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ball Mill]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vibratory Tumbler&lt;br /&gt;
* Sieve Shaker&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns|Electric Furnaces]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39357</id>
		<title>Category:Equipment</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Category:Equipment&amp;diff=39357"/>
		<updated>2025-07-07T18:15:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;See our [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/equipment/list/ equipment status list and SOPs].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Learn more about our [https://mill.mse.gatech.edu/equipment/about/ Equipment Teams].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Characterization==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
**Digital Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Stereomicroscope&lt;br /&gt;
**Inverted Microscope&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Profilometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Spectroscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Measurement==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mechanical Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Microhardness Tester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Moisture Analyzer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infrared Camera]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UV-Vis Spectrophotometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Contact Angle Goniometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Analytical Balance]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brookfield DV2T Viscometer|Viscometer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pycnometer&lt;br /&gt;
*Abrasion Tester&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Squidstat]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Processing==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3D Printing ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)]]/Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Ultimaker 2+&lt;br /&gt;
** Hyrel System 30M&lt;br /&gt;
** Prusa i3 MK3S&lt;br /&gt;
** Dimension SST 1200es&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stereolithography (SLA)]] Printers&lt;br /&gt;
** Resin Printer&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filament Recycling]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Granulator&lt;br /&gt;
** Filament Extruder&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Science of Art ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Hot Plates&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/vinyl-cutter/ Vinyl Cutter]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Textiles ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sewing Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Embroidery Machine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Screen Printer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Heat Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Vacuum Former&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liquid Nitrogen Generator]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ceramics Lab (Love 369) ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Uniaxial Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ball Mill]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Vibratory Tumbler&lt;br /&gt;
* Sieve Shaker&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Furnaces &amp;amp; Kilns|Electric Furnaces]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Microhardness&amp;diff=39330</id>
		<title>Microhardness</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Microhardness&amp;diff=39330"/>
		<updated>2025-06-14T20:03:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | LECO Microhardness Tester [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/microhardness-tester/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[File:Microhardness-052621.png|center|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Objectives&#039;&#039;&#039;: 10x, 50x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Indenters&#039;&#039;&#039;: Vickers, Knoop&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Load Force&#039;&#039;&#039;: 5-2000gf (0.05-19.61N)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Dwell Time&#039;&#039;&#039;: 0-20s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Standard Comformation:&#039;&#039;&#039; ASTM E-384, JIS B-7734, ISO 4545 (Knoop), and ISO 6507 (Vickers)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The LECO LM 248 AT is a hardness tester that is designed to measure the hardness of materials on the microscopic level. The machine can magnify a surface as much as 50x and measure the hardness of a sample on the Vickers, Knoop, and Rockwell C scales. Hardness testing is used for two general characterizations: material characteristics (such as confirming material, testing hardenability, and predicting tensile strength) or functionality (testing wear resistance, toughness, and resistance to impact).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Introduction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hardness tests are a simple method to determine the resistance of a metal to plastic deformation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Meyers&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meyers, M., &amp;amp;amp; Chawla, K. (2016). Hardness. In Mechanical Behavior of Materials (2nd ed., pp. 214–225). chapter, Cambridge University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Indentation tests constitute the vast majority of hardness tests and can be divided into three classes: nanoindentation, microindentation, and macroindentation (based on the indentation load used). The smaller the indentation, the harder the material. Both the yield stress and the work-hardening characteristics of the metal are important in determining the hardness. Hardness is not considered a fundamental property of a material; it represents a quantity measure on an arbitrary scale. There are several different methods used for hardness testing, which use varying shapes of indenters and loads. The MILL’s Leco LM 248AT comes with Vickers and Knoop indenters and calculates Rockwell C hardness from whichever of these scales is being used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Preparation == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following precautions are recommended for reproducible results in hardness testing:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NEWAGE&amp;quot;&amp;gt; NEWAGE Hardness Testers. (n.d.). Hardness Testing Basics. NEWAGE Hardness Testers - Rockwell Testers, Brinell Testers, Microhardness Testers, Optical Systems and Hardness Testing Software. https://www.hardnesstesters.com/test-types/hardness-testing-basics. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The indenter and anvil should be clean and well seated.&lt;br /&gt;
# The surface to be tested should be clean, dry, smooth, and free from oxide. A rough-ground surface is usually adequate for a Vickers macro-hardness test, while the Knoop indenter requires pre-polishing of the surface to a microscopic grade.&lt;br /&gt;
# The surface should be flat and perpendicular to the indenter. Any specimen movement during indentation can cause deformed indents.&lt;br /&gt;
# The thickness of the specimen should be such that a mark or bulge is not produced on the reverse side of the piece. It is recommended that the thickness be at least 10 times the depth of the indentation. Tests should be made on only a single thickness of material.&lt;br /&gt;
# The spacing between indentations should be at least 3 times the longest dimension of the indentation, to avoid interaction between the work-hardening regions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Macro-indentation Tests == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hardness1.png|thumb|600px|Diagram of Rockwell Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Rockwell test is popular and convenient, since there is no need to measure the depth or width of the indentation optically. This testing procedure is illustrated below. A preload is applied prior to the application of the main load. The dial of the machine provides a number that is related to the depth of the indentation produced by the main load. A Brale indenter, a diamond cone with an angle of 120°, is used in Rockwell C tests. The Rockwell C scale is usually used for harder steels. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Vickers test uses a diamond pyramidal indenter with a square base, with an angle between the faces of 136°. One of the known advantages of the Vickers test is that one indenter covers all the materials, from the softest to the hardest. The load is increased with hardness, and there is a continuity in scale. The Vickers hardness (HV) is computed from the equation below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;HV = \frac{2P \cdot \mathrm{sin(\alpha/2)}}{d^2} \approx \frac{1.8544P}{d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the applied load (in kgf), d is the average length of the diagonals (in mm), and α is the angle between the opposite faces of the indenter (136°). Conversion to MPa is accomplished by multiplying this value by 9.81. After the indentation, both diagonals of impression are measured, and their average is taken. If the surface is cylindrical or spherical, a correction factor (ASTM Standard E92, Tables 4 through 6) has to be introduced. Microhardness tests utilize a load lighter than 200 gf, and very minute impressions are thus formed; a load of 200 gf produces an indentation of about 50 μm for a medium-hardness metal. These tests are ideally suited to investigate changes in hardness at the microscopic scale. One can measure the hardness of a second-phase particle and identify regions within a grain where differences in hardness occur. Micro-hardness tests are also used to perform routine tests on very small precision components, such as parts of watches. When a metal is alloyed, the distribution of the solute is not even throughout the grain, due to the stress fields produced by the solute atom. The solute atoms often tend to segregate at the grain boundaries, significantly increasing or decreasing the hardness in these areas. This effect can be noted at extremely low concentrations of solute (a few parts per million).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Micro-indentation Tests ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen Shot 2021-06-09 at 10.18.04 AM.png|thumb|539x539px|Shapes of Vickers (VK) and Knoop (HK) indenters, depth and minimum sample thickness requirements of each indenter.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot;&amp;gt;LECO Corporation. (2017). &#039;&#039;Lm Series Digital Microindentation Tester Instruction Manual&#039;&#039;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The two most common micro-indentation tests are the Knoop and Vickers tests. The Knoop indenter is an elongated square pyramid, while Vickers indenter is a regular square pyramid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The hardness is obtained from the surface area of the impression and is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; KHN = \frac {14229P}{L^2} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where P is the load of gf and L is the length of the major diagonal, in micrometers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Dwell Time ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ASTM specification for dwell time is 10 to 15 seconds. The dwell time can be changed to meet a specific requirement. As a general rule, a shorter load time is preferable as it reduces the chances of outside influence (vibration, etc.) on the tester.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;:0&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Distance Between Indentations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Spacing indentations too close together can cause the test piece to become “work hardened” in that area, resulting in false readings. Be sure to maintain proper spacing between indents, in all directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vickers vs. Knoop ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Vickers Hardness test has two significant advantages:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Geometrically similar indentations and relatively constant hardness values are obtained, regardless of the loads applied, as long as test specimens are homogeneous.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Materials ranging from extremely soft to extremely hard can be tested without changing loads.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Knoop Hardness test should only be used for measurement of extremely thin plates and brittle materials that cannot be measured by ordinary Vickers Hardness tests. The geometric shape of Knoop indents does vary with the load used.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Micro-hardness vs. Macro-hardness ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are several problems with the extrapolation of micro-indentation testing to macro indentation results. First, almost invariably, the micro-hardness of any material is higher than its standard macro-hardness. Additionally, the micro-hardness varies with load. Second, there is a tendency for the micro-hardness to increase (up to a few grams); then the hardness value drops with load. At very low loads, one is essentially measuring the hardness of a single grain; the indenter ‘‘sees” a single crystal, and the plastic deformation produced by the indentation is contained in this grain. As the load is increased, plastic deformation of adjoining grains is involved, and a truly polycrystalline deformation regimen is achieved. Grain size has a marked effect on the yield strength and work-hardening characteristics of metals. Yet another potential source of error is the work-hardening introduced in the surface by polishing. The effect of crystallographic orientation, when the impression is restricted to a single grain, is of utmost importance. It is well known that both the yield stress and the work-hardening are dependent on the crystallographic orientation of the material. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Relationships Between Yield Stress and Hardness == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For non-work-hardening (brittle) materials, hardness is equal to three times the yield stress (H = 3σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Since there is a lot of plastic deformation under the indenter, in work-hardening (ductile) materials yield strain cannot be used. The mean plastic strain under the indenter is described by the following equation: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\varepsilon_p = \frac{d&#039;}{5D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where d′ is the diameter at the top of the pileup and D is the diameter of the indenter. For d′/D = 0.375, a reasonable value for indentation, the plastic strain, εp = 0.075. Hence, for work-hardening metals, one should take the flow stress at a plastic strain of 0.375 before multiplying it by 3 for a good correlation with the hardness.&lt;br /&gt;
== Converting Between Scales ==&lt;br /&gt;
If the desired hardness scale cannot be measured by the Leco tester, a conversion table such as [https://pgisteel.com/hardness-conversion-chart/ this]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Conversion&amp;quot;&amp;gt;  &#039;&#039;Hardness Conversion Chart&#039;&#039;. PGI Steel. (n.d.). https://pgisteel.com/hardness-conversion-chart/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. may be used to find the value on the desired scale. It should be noted that not all hardness scales cover the same range or are designed for the same materials. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|meas]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Mechanical_Testing&amp;diff=39329</id>
		<title>Mechanical Testing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Mechanical_Testing&amp;diff=39329"/>
		<updated>2025-06-14T19:57:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Mark-10 ESM303 [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/mark-10/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Instron 5967 [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/instron/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:Mark10-052621.png|center|250px]]||[[File:Instron-052621.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Load Cells&#039;&#039;&#039;:||500 mN, 25 N, 500 N, 1500 N||30 kN&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Load Capacity&#039;&#039;&#039;:||1.5 kN @ up to 610 mm/min||30 kN&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Speed range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||13 - 330 mm/min||0.001 mm/min - 1000 mm/min&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Travel range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||45.7 cm||1.212 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Max width&#039;&#039;&#039;:||n/a||0.418 m&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mark-10 ESM303 Mechanical Tester is a mechanical testing frame capable of testing materials under tensile, cyclic, compressive, and 3-point bending modes. This machine has several load cells: a 1500 N, a 500 N, a 25 N, and a 500 mN load cell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Instron Mechanical Tester is a mechanical testing frame capable of testing materials under tensile, compressive, and 3-point-bending modes. This machine is equipped with a 30kN load cell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Loading ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Loading.PNG|thumb|199x199px|left|1. Compression 2. Tension 3. Shear 4. Torsion 5. Bending]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A material in service is subjected to different forces. Depending on the magnitude of these forces, the metal may or may not change its shape. The act of applying the force is known as loading. There are several different ways in which these forces may be applied on a part, including compression, tension, and bending. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Velling&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Velling, A. (2021, May 5). Stress-Strain Curve: How to Read the Graph? Fractory. https://fractory.com/stress-strain-curve/. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Meyers&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meyers, M., &amp;amp;amp; Chawla, K. (2016). Hardness. In Mechanical Behavior of Materials (2nd ed., pp. 214–225). chapter, Cambridge University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stress and Strain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== True Stress/Strain ===&lt;br /&gt;
Stress is defined as the ratio of applied force to the cross-sectional area of the material it is applied to. The formula for calculating (true) material stress is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t =\frac{F}{A}, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Where &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; is force, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; is area, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is stress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stress can be understood as an internal force induced in the material in response to an externally applied force (Newton’s 3rd law). It will try to resist any change in dimension caused by the external force. Strain is defined as the ratio of the change in dimension to the initial dimension of the metal. It does not have a unit (sometimes designated as length/length). The formula for calculating (true) strain is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t = \int_{l_0} ^l  \frac{dl}{l} =  ln(\frac{l}{l_0}), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; l_0  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is starting or initial length, &#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039; is current length, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is strain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Engineering Stress/Strain ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many applications, a simpler form of strain, commonly called engineering or nominal strain, is used. This type of strain is defined as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_e = \frac{(l-l_0)}{l_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the strains are reasonably small, the engineering and true strains are approximately the same. The elastic deformation in metals and ceramics rarely exceeds 0.005, and for this value, the difference between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be neglected. In a likewise fashion, engineering (nominal) stress is defined as:[[File:SScurve.PNG|thumb|Engineering stress-strain curve of a typical ductile material &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Roylance&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Roylance, D. (2001, August 23). STRESS-STRAIN CURVES.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = \frac{F}{A_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Where  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; A_0  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the original area of cross-section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normal strain may be positive or negative depending on the external force’s directions and therefore effect on the original length. Tensile stresses and strains are considered to be positive while their compressive counterparts are considered to be negatives. While there are multiple types of stresses and strains, this article focuses on their normal longitudinal variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tensile Testing &amp;amp; Engineering Stress-Strain Curves ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most common method to obtain a stress-strain curve is to subject a sample to a tensile test. When setup for tensile testing, the mechanical testers have two claws which hold the two extremes of the sample and pull it at a uniform rate. The force applied and the strain produced is recorded until a fracture occurs. The two parameters are then plotted on an X-Y graph to get a stress-strain curve. Note that the testers produces a force-displacement plot (with the same general shape) that must be manually converted to a stress-strain curve using the aforementioned equations in conjunction with the sample dimensions (or entering the sample dimensions into the software on the Instron). There are various sections on the stress and strain curve (described below) that describe different behavior of a material depending on the amount of stress induced. Stress and strain curves for brittle and ductile materials are different. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A stress-strain curve always has the same 3 sections: elastic deformation, plastic deformation, and fracture. These three section occur differently in different materials and have subcategories as described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrittleSSCurve.PNG|thumb|300x300px|Typical stress-strain curve of a brittle material &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MechaniCalc&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Mechanical Properties of Materials. MechaniCalc. (n.d.). https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-properties-of-materials.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic Deformation ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the early (low strain) portion of the curve, most materials obey Hooke’s Law &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (F_s=kx) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to a reasonable approximation, with the constant of proportionality being the modulus of elasticity or Young’s modulus (E), described by the following equation:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = E\epsilon_e \rightarrow E= \frac{\sigma_e}{\epsilon_e} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the modulus of resilience, it is analogous to the stiffness of a spring (&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;). That’s also why Hooke’s Law includes a spring constant. Materials exhibit elastic flow (ability to return to their original shape upon unloading) up to a certain strain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Plastic Deformation ==&lt;br /&gt;
As strain is increased, many materials eventually deviate from the linear proportionality of Hooke’s Law, the point of departure being termed the proportional limit. This is usually associated with stress-induced “plastic” flow in the specimen. Here the material is undergoing a rearrangement of its internal molecular or microscopic structure, in which atoms are being moved to new equilibrium positions. This plasticity requires a mechanism for molecular mobility, which in crystalline materials can arise from dislocation motion. Materials lacking this mobility, for instance by having internal microstructures that block dislocation motion, are usually brittle rather than ductile (fail at lower rather than higher strains). The stress-strain curve for brittle materials are typically linear over their full range of strain, eventually terminating in fracture with no to minimal plastic flow (permanent deformation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Yield Stress ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0.2Offset.PNG|thumb|Graphical depiction of finding 0.2% offset yield strength (stress)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The stress needed to increase the strain beyond the proportional limit in a ductile material continues to rise beyond the proportional limit; the material requires an ever-increasing stress to continue straining, a mechanism termed strain hardening. Microstructural rearrangements associated with plastic flow are usually not reversed. The residual strain induced by a given stress can be determined by drawing an unloading line from the highest point reached on the engineering stress strain curve at that stress back to the strain axis, drawn with a slope equal to that of the initial elastic loading line. This is done because the material unloads elastically, there being no force driving the molecular structure back to its original position. A closely related term is the yield stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\sigma_y) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; this is the stress needed to induce plastic deformation in the specimen. Since it is often difficult to pinpoint the exact stress at which plastic deformation begins, the yield stress is often taken to be the stress needed to induce a specified amount of permanent strain, typically 0.2%. The construction used to find this “offset yield stress” is shown below, where a line of slope E is drawn from the strain axis at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon = 0.2\% &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; this is the unloading line that would result in the specified permanent strain. The stress at the point of intersection with the curve is the offset yield stress. Engineering calculations typically use a material’s yield strength for determining its ability to resist a load because if the load is greater than the yield strength, the result will be unwanted plastic deformation. See [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0TQ8SV0g2U&amp;amp;t=586s this video] for a detailed explanation of how to find the 0.2% offset yield stress &amp;amp; strain in Excel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ultimate Strength ===&lt;br /&gt;
It appears that the rate of strain hardening decreases up to the ultimate strength (UTS), the greatest level of stress on the curve. Beyond that point, the material appears to strain soften, so that each increment of additional strain requires a smaller stress. The apparent change from strain hardening to strain softening is an artifact of the plotting procedure (using engineering rather than true values), as is the maximum observed in the curve at the UTS. Even though the UTS is perhaps the materials property most commonly reported in tensile tests, it is not a direct measure of the material due to the influence of geometry, and should be used with caution. The yield stress is usually preferred to the UTS in designing with ductile metals, although the UTS is a valid design criterion for brittle materials that do not exhibit flow-induced reductions in cross-sectional area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Necking ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Necking.PNG|thumb|Necking in a tensile specimen]]&lt;br /&gt;
The true stress is not quite uniform throughout the specimen, and there will always be some location - perhaps a nick or some other defect at the surface - where the local stress is maximum. Once the maximum in the engineering curve has been reached, the localized flow at this site cannot be compensated by further strain hardening, so the area there is reduced further. This increases the local stress even more, which accelerates the flow further. This localized and increasing flow soon leads to a “neck” in the gage length of the specimen such as that seen below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until the neck forms, the deformation is essentially uniform throughout the specimen, but after necking all subsequent deformation takes place in the neck. The neck becomes smaller and smaller, local true stress increases all the time, until the specimen fails. This will be the failure mode for most ductile metals. As the neck shrinks, the nonuniform geometry there alters the uniaxial stress state to a complex one involving shear components as well as normal stresses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Drawing ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drawing.PNG|thumb|Necking and drawing in a stress-strain curve]]&lt;br /&gt;
This figure shows the engineering stress-strain curve for a semi-crystalline thermoplastic. The response of this material is similar to that of typical metals, in that it shows a proportional limit followed by a maximum in the curve at which necking takes place. (This is commonly described in plastics as the yield stress, although plastic flow has begun at earlier strains.) The polymer, however, differs dramatically in that the neck does not continue shrinking until the specimen fails. Rather, the material in the neck stretches only to a “natural draw ratio” which is a function of temperature and specimen processing, beyond which the material in the neck stops stretching and new material at the neck shoulders necks down. The neck then propagates until it spans the full gage length of the specimen, a process called drawing. This process can be observed without the need for a testing machine, by stretching a “six-pack holder.” Not all polymers are able to sustain this drawing process. Drawing occurs when the necking process produces a strengthened microstructure whose breaking load is greater than that needed to induce necking in the untransformed material just outside the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Failure ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrittleDuctile.PNG|thumb|Smooth brittle fracture (left) and &amp;quot;cup and cone&amp;quot; shaped ductile fracture (right)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ductile specimens often fail with a “cup and cone” geometry as seen below, in which the outer regions fail in shear and the interior in tension. When the specimen fractures, the engineering strain at break &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  will include the deformation in the necked region and the un-necked region together. Since the true strain in the neck is larger than that in the un-necked material, the value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  will depend on the fraction of the gage length that has necked. Therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of the specimen geometry as well as the material, and thus is only a crude measure of material ductility. Brittle specimen failure is characterized by very rapid cracking under stress while little or no evidence of ductility or plastic degradation before the fracture occurs. When a piece of equipment suffers a brittle fracture, there is no thinning or necking down. Rather, this damage mechanism often causes cracking without warning, sometimes fracturing equipment into many pieces. Brittle fracture is often caused by low temperatures. If a metal is at or below its brittle-to-ductile transition temperature, then it will be susceptible to brittle fracture. Critical sized flaws, metallurgical degradation, large grain sizes, and high thickness significantly increase the likelihood of a sample experiencing brittle fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== True Stress-Strain Curve ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TrueSSC.PNG|thumb|A true stress-strain curve compared its engineering counterpart &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fracture&amp;quot;&amp;gt; United States Naval Academy. (n.d.). FRACTURE OF MATERIALS. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
During elastic deformation, the change in cross-sectional area is less than 1% for most metals and ceramics; thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e \approx \sigma_t &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, during plastic deformation, the differences between the true and the engineering values become progressively larger as the specimen dimensions experience substantial change from their original values. Due to this, the engineering stress-strain curve must be interpreted with caution beyond the elastic limits. Using the true stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = \frac{F}{A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; rather than the engineering stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = \frac{F}{A_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can give a more direct measure of the material’s response in the plastic flow range, although this requires using the following additional equations: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t =ln(1+\epsilon_e) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = \sigma_e(1+\epsilon_e) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ductile metals often have true stress-strain relations that can be described by a simple power-law relation of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = A\epsilon_tn \rightarrow log(\sigma_t) = log(A) + nlog(\epsilon_t)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The strain hardening parameter (n), is the slope of the log-log plot, and is useful as a measure of the resistance to necking. Ductile metals at room temperature usually exhibit values of n from 0.02 to 0.5.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Toughness.PNG|thumb|Resilience and toughness shown graphically]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Strain Energy, Resilience, &amp;amp; Toughness ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EnergyDissipated.PNG|thumb|How to graphically determine energy dissipated in a plastically deformed (but not fractured) specimen ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The area under the engineering stress-strain curve up to a given value of strain is the total mechanical energy per unit volume consumed by the material in straining it to that value. This is easily shown as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U^* = \frac {1}{V} \int FdL= \int_0^L \frac{FdL}{A_0L_0}= \int_0^{\epsilon}\sigma d\epsilon &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the absence of molecular slip and other mechanisms for energy dissipation, this mechanical energy is stored reversibly within the material as strain energy. The area up to the yield point is termed the modulus of resilience, and the total area up to fracture is termed the modulus of toughness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “resilience” alludes to the concept that up to the point of yielding, the material is unaffected by the applied stress and upon unloading will return to its original shape. But when the strain exceeds the yield point, the material is deformed irreversibly, so that some residual strain will persist even after unloading. The modulus of resilience is then the quantity of energy the material can absorb without suffering damage. Similarly, the modulus of toughness is the energy needed to completely fracture the material. Materials showing good impact resistance, as well as ductile materials, are generally those with high moduli of toughness. The resilience &amp;amp; toughness integrals can be calculated from stress-strain data via methods such as [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8g3B2iySA4&amp;amp;ab_channel=StephanieGlen trapezoidal Riemann sums in Excel]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During loading, the area under the stress-strain curve is the strain energy per unit volume absorbed by the material. Conversely, the area under the unloading curve is the energy released by the material. In the elastic range, these areas are equal and no net energy is absorbed. But if the material is loaded into the plastic range as shown above, the energy absorbed exceeds the energy released and the difference is dissipated as heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Compression ==&lt;br /&gt;
Materials that exhibit high tensile strength tend to (but do not always!) exhibit low compressive strength. Likewise, materials high in compressive strength tend to exhibit low tensile strength. Therefore, compression testing is often used on brittle materials such as concrete, metals, plastics, ceramics, composites, and corrugated materials like cardboard. These materials are often used in a load-bearing capacity where their integrity under compressive forces is critical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike tensile tests, which are usually conducted to determine the tensile properties of a specific material, compression tests are often performed on finished products. Common items such as tennis balls, golf balls, water bottles, protective cases, plastic pipes, and furniture are all examples of products that need to be evaluated for their compressive strength. For example, an engineer may want to conserve plastic by creating water bottles with thinner walls, but the bottles must still be strong enough to be packed in pallets and stacked on top of each other for transport. Compression testing can help the engineer fine tune the balance between product strength and material conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as the loads are sufficiently small (stresses less than the proportional limit), in many materials the relations outlined for tensile testing apply equally well in compression. The expression for deformation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\delta) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a given load &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \delta = \frac{FL}{AE} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
applies just as in tension, with negative values for δ and F indicating compression. Further, the modulus E is the same in tension and compression to a good approximation, and the stress-strain curve simply extends as a straight line into the third quadrant as shown below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some practical difficulties in performing stress-strain tests in compression. If excessively large loads are mistakenly applied in a tensile test, perhaps by wrong settings on the testing machine, the specimen simply breaks and the test must be repeated with a new specimen. But in compression, a mistake can easily damage the load cell or other sensitive components, since even after specimen failure the loads are not necessarily relieved. This is why when designing a method for the Instron tester, there must always be a second stop condition at 28kN load. The ultimate compressive strength of a material is the value of compressive stress reached when the material fails completely. When brittle materials reach their ultimate compressive strength they are crushed, and the load drops drastically. Materials with higher ductility, (most plastics) do not rupture, but instead continue deforming  until the load is no longer being applied to the specimen, but rather between the two compression platens. In these cases, compressive strength can be reported as specific deformations such as 1%, 5%, or 10% of the test specimen&#039;s original height. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Instron&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Instron. (n.d.). What is Compression Testing? https://www.instron.us/en-us/our-company/library/test-types/compression-test. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bend Testing ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BendVMDiagram.PNG|thumb|Diagram of a three point bend test, with graphs of bending moment &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039;, shear &#039;&#039;Q&#039;&#039; and deflection &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Penn&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Three Point and Four Point Bending | Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders | Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. (n.d.). https://www.med.upenn.edu/pcmd/3pt-4pt-bending.html. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In bending tests, standardized, mostly cylindrical specimens are placed centrally on a test fixture. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;GOM&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Bending test: Suitable for both brittle and ductile materials. (n.d.). https://www.gom.com/en/topics/bend-test. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rounded support rollers (bearings) are arranged parallel to each other at a certain distance (support width). The diameter of the cylindrical specimen is proportional to the support width of the bearings. The test punch, which moves down slowly and at a constant speed, loads the sample with increasing force until it breaks or reaches the previously determined deformation. Flexural modulus (elastic modulus in bending), stress-strain behavior, and failure limits can all be obtained using a bend test. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Bruker&amp;quot;&amp;gt; 3-Point Bend Testing. Bruker. (n.d.). https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/test-and-measurement/tribometers-and-mechanical-testers/3-point-bend-testing.html. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 3-point bending test is the most frequently performed bending test. However, it has the disadvantage that in addition to the compressive and tensile forces exerted, transverse forces are also effective in the material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the test, the values of the bending force and deflection are recorded, which are then used to determine the material characteristics. The test sequence is plotted in a stress-strain curve and can also be recorded with a video camera. Bending tests are performed to obtain information about the bending behavior of the tested material from the single-axis bending stress. In case of brittle materials, the bending strength is determined this way.  For ductile materials, the limit yield point, greatest possible bending angle, and Young’s modulus are determined. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of the flexural stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f = \frac{3 F L}{2 b d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for a rectangular cross section&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f = \frac{F L}{\pi R^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for a circular cross section&amp;lt;ref name=Biomaterials&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Chapter 4 Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials&amp;quot;. Biomaterials – The intersection of Biology and Material Science. New Jersey, United States: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2008. p. 152.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of the flexural strain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f = \frac{6Dd}{L^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of flexural modulus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Zweben&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Zweben, C., W. S. Smith, and M. W. Wardle (1979), &amp;quot;Test methods for fiber tensile strength, composite flexural modulus, and properties of fabric-reinforced laminates&amp;quot;, Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference), ASTM International&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f = \frac{L^3 m}{4 b d^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in these formulas the following parameters are used:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = Stress in outer fibers at midpoint, (MPa)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = Strain in the outer surface, (mm/mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = flexural Modulus of elasticity,(MPa)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = load at a given point on the load deflection curve, (N)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Support span, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Width of test beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Depth or thickness of tested beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = maximum deflection of the center of the beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = The gradient (i.e., slope) of the initial straight-line portion of the load deflection curve, (N/mm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = The radius of the beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a bending test, the bending stress is greatest in the center of the specimen (highest deflection). At this point, the greatest bending moment is always present. From the central pressure point, the bending moment decreases linearly in both directions toward the bearings. The material is subjected to pressure on its inner side and tension on its outer side. In the outer fibers of the specimen, the bending stress (tensile and compressive stress) is greatest and decreases inwards toward the neutral fiber. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a partially plastically deformed specimen is relieved during the bending test by raising the test punch, only the internal stresses (residual stresses) present in the material and the resulting torque are still effective. This will partially reshape the sample.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bending Behavior of Ductile Materials ===&lt;br /&gt;
If the bending stress in the sample made of a ductile material is lower than the limit stress of the plastic deformation, the bending stress is exclusively elastic. As the bending stress increases, the yield strength is exceeded first in the peripheral areas of the specimen. These areas then deform plastically (the so-called material flow). The limit yield point is the limit bending stress up to which easily deformable materials can be loaded by bending without permanent deformation in the marginal area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moment this kind of deformation occurs can be determined directly from the deflection-force diagram, in a similar manner to how the yield strength is found in a tensile test. With deflection increasing steadily, more and more internal areas of the specimen are involved in the plastic deformation. This is a result of the stress increase. For steels, for example, the limit yield point is between 10 to 20 percent higher than the yield strength due to the linear stress increase. If the yield strength is exceeded in the edge fibers during the bending test, the inner and exclusively elastically stressed fibers impede the flow movement. Bending tests with ductile materials are different from those performed with brittle materials: Tough materials can be subjected to extreme plastic deformation, but they cannot be broken, no matter how strong the applied force is. Therefore, a bending test with a ductile sample is finished when the yield point is exceeded. The bending strength of ductile materials is determined by the point in time at which the plastic deformation occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bending Behavior of Brittle Materials ===&lt;br /&gt;
Specimens made of brittle materials show a different bending behavior during materials testing. They break without clearly visible material flow behavior. Therefore, the determination of the limit yield point is more complicated for brittle materials. In order to be able to determine the bending strength nevertheless, the maximum bending stress at which the sample breaks is determined. However, the bending strength is a fictitious value that is not identical to the bending stress actually occurring in the material. Another characteristic of bending tests with brittle materials is the fracture deflection. This technical term describes the greatest possible deflection of a specimen shortly before fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fracture deflection depends on the support width: Larger distances between the bearings allow for greater deflections. In order to check the strength of brittle materials, the bending test is often more suitable than the tensile test, because the materials are subjected to bending stress only. If this sample were to be subjected to a tensile test, it would break prematurely and measurement problems would occur. For certain brittle materials, the tensile test is therefore replaced by the bending test. These materials include thermosetting sheets and molding materials, thermoplastic injection molding compounds, and fiber-reinforced plastics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related Theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cyclic Loading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stress Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|meas]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Mechanical_Testing&amp;diff=39328</id>
		<title>Mechanical Testing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Mechanical_Testing&amp;diff=39328"/>
		<updated>2025-06-14T19:04:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Mark-10 ESM303 [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/mark-10/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
!style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Instron 5967 [https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/instron/ [SOP&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:Mark10-052621.png|center|250px]]||[[File:Instron-052621.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Load Cells&#039;&#039;&#039;:||500 mN, 25 N, 500 N, 1500 N||30 kN&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Load Capacity&#039;&#039;&#039;:||1.5 kN @ up to 610 mm/min||30 kN&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Speed range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||13 - 330 mm/min||0.001 mm/min - 1000 mm/min&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Travel range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||45.7 cm||1.212 m&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Max width&#039;&#039;&#039;:||n/a||0.418 m&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mark-10 ESM303 Mechanical Tester is a mechanical testing frame capable of testing materials under tensile, cyclic, compressive, and 3-point bending modes. This machine has several load cells: a 1500 N, a 500 N, a 25 N, and a 500 mN load cell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Instron Mechanical Tester is a mechanical testing frame capable of testing materials under tensile, compressive, and 3-point-bending modes. This machine is equipped with a 30kN load cell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Loading ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Loading.PNG|thumb|199x199px|left|1. Compression 2. Tension 3. Shear 4. Torsion 5. Bending]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A material in service is subjected to different forces. Depending on the magnitude of these forces, the metal may or may not change its shape. The act of applying the force is known as loading. There are several different ways in which these forces may be applied on a part, including compression, tension, and bending. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Velling&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Velling, A. (2021, May 5). Stress-Strain Curve: How to Read the Graph? Fractory. https://fractory.com/stress-strain-curve/. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Meyers&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Meyers, M., &amp;amp;amp; Chawla, K. (2016). Hardness. In Mechanical Behavior of Materials (2nd ed., pp. 214–225). chapter, Cambridge University Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Stress and Strain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== True Stress/Strain ===&lt;br /&gt;
Stress is defined as the ratio of applied force to the cross-sectional area of the material it is applied to. The formula for calculating (true) material stress is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t =\frac{F}{A}, &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Where &#039;&#039;F&#039;&#039; is force, &#039;&#039;A&#039;&#039; is area, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is stress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stress can be understood as an internal force induced in the material in response to an externally applied force (Newton’s 3rd law). It will try to resist any change in dimension caused by the external force. Strain is defined as the ratio of the change in dimension to the initial dimension of the metal. It does not have a unit (sometimes designated as length/length). The formula for calculating (true) strain is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t = \int_{l_0} ^l  \frac{dl}{l} =  ln(\frac{l}{l_0}), &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; Where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; l_0  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is starting or initial length, &#039;&#039;l&#039;&#039; is current length, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is strain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Engineering Stress/Strain ===&lt;br /&gt;
In many applications, a simpler form of strain, commonly called engineering or nominal strain, is used. This type of strain is defined as&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_e = \frac{(l-l_0)}{l_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the strains are reasonably small, the engineering and true strains are approximately the same. The elastic deformation in metals and ceramics rarely exceeds 0.005, and for this value, the difference between &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_e &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be neglected. In a likewise fashion, engineering (nominal) stress is defined as:[[File:SScurve.PNG|thumb|Engineering stress-strain curve of a typical ductile material &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Roylance&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Roylance, D. (2001, August 23). STRESS-STRAIN CURVES.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = \frac{F}{A_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, Where  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; A_0  &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the original area of cross-section.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Normal strain may be positive or negative depending on the external force’s directions and therefore effect on the original length. Tensile stresses and strains are considered to be positive while their compressive counterparts are considered to be negatives. While there are multiple types of stresses and strains, this article focuses on their normal longitudinal variants.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tensile Testing &amp;amp; Engineering Stress-Strain Curves ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most common method to obtain a stress-strain curve is to subject a sample to a tensile test. When setup for tensile testing, the mechanical testers have two claws which hold the two extremes of the sample and pull it at a uniform rate. The force applied and the strain produced is recorded until a fracture occurs. The two parameters are then plotted on an X-Y graph to get a stress-strain curve. Note that the testers produces a force-displacement plot (with the same general shape) that must be manually converted to a stress-strain curve using the aforementioned equations in conjunction with the sample dimensions (or entering the sample dimensions into the software on the Instron). There are various sections on the stress and strain curve (described below) that describe different behavior of a material depending on the amount of stress induced. Stress and strain curves for brittle and ductile materials are different. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A stress-strain curve always has the same 3 sections: elastic deformation, plastic deformation, and fracture. These three section occur differently in different materials and have subcategories as described below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrittleSSCurve.PNG|thumb|300x300px|Typical stress-strain curve of a brittle material &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MechaniCalc&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Mechanical Properties of Materials. MechaniCalc. (n.d.). https://mechanicalc.com/reference/mechanical-properties-of-materials.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic Deformation ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the early (low strain) portion of the curve, most materials obey Hooke’s Law &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (F_s=kx) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to a reasonable approximation, with the constant of proportionality being the modulus of elasticity or Young’s modulus (E), described by the following equation:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = E\epsilon_e \rightarrow E= \frac{\sigma_e}{\epsilon_e} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also known as the modulus of resilience, it is analogous to the stiffness of a spring (&#039;&#039;k&#039;&#039;). That’s also why Hooke’s Law includes a spring constant. Materials exhibit elastic flow (ability to return to their original shape upon unloading) up to a certain strain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Plastic Deformation ==&lt;br /&gt;
As strain is increased, many materials eventually deviate from the linear proportionality of Hooke’s Law, the point of departure being termed the proportional limit. This is usually associated with stress-induced “plastic” flow in the specimen. Here the material is undergoing a rearrangement of its internal molecular or microscopic structure, in which atoms are being moved to new equilibrium positions. This plasticity requires a mechanism for molecular mobility, which in crystalline materials can arise from dislocation motion. Materials lacking this mobility, for instance by having internal microstructures that block dislocation motion, are usually brittle rather than ductile (fail at lower rather than higher strains). The stress-strain curve for brittle materials are typically linear over their full range of strain, eventually terminating in fracture with no to minimal plastic flow (permanent deformation).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Yield Stress ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0.2Offset.PNG|thumb|Graphical depiction of finding 0.2% offset yield strength (stress)]]&lt;br /&gt;
The stress needed to increase the strain beyond the proportional limit in a ductile material continues to rise beyond the proportional limit; the material requires an ever-increasing stress to continue straining, a mechanism termed strain hardening. Microstructural rearrangements associated with plastic flow are usually not reversed. The residual strain induced by a given stress can be determined by drawing an unloading line from the highest point reached on the engineering stress strain curve at that stress back to the strain axis, drawn with a slope equal to that of the initial elastic loading line. This is done because the material unloads elastically, there being no force driving the molecular structure back to its original position. A closely related term is the yield stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\sigma_y) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; this is the stress needed to induce plastic deformation in the specimen. Since it is often difficult to pinpoint the exact stress at which plastic deformation begins, the yield stress is often taken to be the stress needed to induce a specified amount of permanent strain, typically 0.2%. The construction used to find this “offset yield stress” is shown below, where a line of slope E is drawn from the strain axis at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon = 0.2\% &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; this is the unloading line that would result in the specified permanent strain. The stress at the point of intersection with the curve is the offset yield stress. Engineering calculations typically use a material’s yield strength for determining its ability to resist a load because if the load is greater than the yield strength, the result will be unwanted plastic deformation. See [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0TQ8SV0g2U&amp;amp;t=586s this video] for a detailed explanation of how to find the 0.2% offset yield stress &amp;amp; strain in Excel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ultimate Strength ===&lt;br /&gt;
It appears that the rate of strain hardening decreases up to the ultimate strength (UTS), the greatest level of stress on the curve. Beyond that point, the material appears to strain soften, so that each increment of additional strain requires a smaller stress. The apparent change from strain hardening to strain softening is an artifact of the plotting procedure (using engineering rather than true values), as is the maximum observed in the curve at the UTS. Even though the UTS is perhaps the materials property most commonly reported in tensile tests, it is not a direct measure of the material due to the influence of geometry, and should be used with caution. The yield stress is usually preferred to the UTS in designing with ductile metals, although the UTS is a valid design criterion for brittle materials that do not exhibit flow-induced reductions in cross-sectional area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Necking ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Necking.PNG|thumb|Necking in a tensile specimen]]&lt;br /&gt;
The true stress is not quite uniform throughout the specimen, and there will always be some location - perhaps a nick or some other defect at the surface - where the local stress is maximum. Once the maximum in the engineering curve has been reached, the localized flow at this site cannot be compensated by further strain hardening, so the area there is reduced further. This increases the local stress even more, which accelerates the flow further. This localized and increasing flow soon leads to a “neck” in the gage length of the specimen such as that seen below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until the neck forms, the deformation is essentially uniform throughout the specimen, but after necking all subsequent deformation takes place in the neck. The neck becomes smaller and smaller, local true stress increases all the time, until the specimen fails. This will be the failure mode for most ductile metals. As the neck shrinks, the nonuniform geometry there alters the uniaxial stress state to a complex one involving shear components as well as normal stresses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Drawing ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Drawing.PNG|thumb|Necking and drawing in a stress-strain curve]]&lt;br /&gt;
This figure shows the engineering stress-strain curve for a semi-crystalline thermoplastic. The response of this material is similar to that of typical metals, in that it shows a proportional limit followed by a maximum in the curve at which necking takes place. (This is commonly described in plastics as the yield stress, although plastic flow has begun at earlier strains.) The polymer, however, differs dramatically in that the neck does not continue shrinking until the specimen fails. Rather, the material in the neck stretches only to a “natural draw ratio” which is a function of temperature and specimen processing, beyond which the material in the neck stops stretching and new material at the neck shoulders necks down. The neck then propagates until it spans the full gage length of the specimen, a process called drawing. This process can be observed without the need for a testing machine, by stretching a “six-pack holder.” Not all polymers are able to sustain this drawing process. Drawing occurs when the necking process produces a strengthened microstructure whose breaking load is greater than that needed to induce necking in the untransformed material just outside the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Failure ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BrittleDuctile.PNG|thumb|Smooth brittle fracture (left) and &amp;quot;cup and cone&amp;quot; shaped ductile fracture (right)]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ductile specimens often fail with a “cup and cone” geometry as seen below, in which the outer regions fail in shear and the interior in tension. When the specimen fractures, the engineering strain at break &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  will include the deformation in the necked region and the un-necked region together. Since the true strain in the neck is larger than that in the un-necked material, the value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  will depend on the fraction of the gage length that has necked. Therefore, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\epsilon_f) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a function of the specimen geometry as well as the material, and thus is only a crude measure of material ductility. Brittle specimen failure is characterized by very rapid cracking under stress while little or no evidence of ductility or plastic degradation before the fracture occurs. When a piece of equipment suffers a brittle fracture, there is no thinning or necking down. Rather, this damage mechanism often causes cracking without warning, sometimes fracturing equipment into many pieces. Brittle fracture is often caused by low temperatures. If a metal is at or below its brittle-to-ductile transition temperature, then it will be susceptible to brittle fracture. Critical sized flaws, metallurgical degradation, large grain sizes, and high thickness significantly increase the likelihood of a sample experiencing brittle fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== True Stress-Strain Curve ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TrueSSC.PNG|thumb|A true stress-strain curve compared its engineering counterpart &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fracture&amp;quot;&amp;gt; United States Naval Academy. (n.d.). FRACTURE OF MATERIALS. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
During elastic deformation, the change in cross-sectional area is less than 1% for most metals and ceramics; thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e \approx \sigma_t &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. However, during plastic deformation, the differences between the true and the engineering values become progressively larger as the specimen dimensions experience substantial change from their original values. Due to this, the engineering stress-strain curve must be interpreted with caution beyond the elastic limits. Using the true stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = \frac{F}{A} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; rather than the engineering stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_e = \frac{F}{A_0} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can give a more direct measure of the material’s response in the plastic flow range, although this requires using the following additional equations: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_t =ln(1+\epsilon_e) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = \sigma_e(1+\epsilon_e) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ductile metals often have true stress-strain relations that can be described by a simple power-law relation of the form:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma_t = A\epsilon_tn → log(\sigma_t) = log(A) + nlog(\epsilon_t) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The strain hardening parameter (n), is the slope of the log-log plot, and is useful as a measure of the resistance to necking. Ductile metals at room temperature usually exhibit values of n from 0.02 to 0.5.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Toughness.PNG|thumb|Resilience and toughness shown graphically]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Strain Energy, Resilience, &amp;amp; Toughness ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EnergyDissipated.PNG|thumb|How to graphically determine energy dissipated in a plastically deformed (but not fractured) specimen ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The area under the engineering stress-strain curve up to a given value of strain is the total mechanical energy per unit volume consumed by the material in straining it to that value. This is easily shown as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; U^* = \frac {1}{V} \int FdL= \int_0^L \frac{FdL}{A_0L_0}= \int_0^{\epsilon}\sigma d\epsilon &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the absence of molecular slip and other mechanisms for energy dissipation, this mechanical energy is stored reversibly within the material as strain energy. The area up to the yield point is termed the modulus of resilience, and the total area up to fracture is termed the modulus of toughness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term “resilience” alludes to the concept that up to the point of yielding, the material is unaffected by the applied stress and upon unloading will return to its original shape. But when the strain exceeds the yield point, the material is deformed irreversibly, so that some residual strain will persist even after unloading. The modulus of resilience is then the quantity of energy the material can absorb without suffering damage. Similarly, the modulus of toughness is the energy needed to completely fracture the material. Materials showing good impact resistance, as well as ductile materials, are generally those with high moduli of toughness. The resilience &amp;amp; toughness integrals can be calculated from stress-strain data via methods such as [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8g3B2iySA4&amp;amp;ab_channel=StephanieGlen trapezoidal Riemann sums in Excel]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During loading, the area under the stress-strain curve is the strain energy per unit volume absorbed by the material. Conversely, the area under the unloading curve is the energy released by the material. In the elastic range, these areas are equal and no net energy is absorbed. But if the material is loaded into the plastic range as shown above, the energy absorbed exceeds the energy released and the difference is dissipated as heat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Compression ==&lt;br /&gt;
Materials that exhibit high tensile strength tend to (but do not always!) exhibit low compressive strength. Likewise, materials high in compressive strength tend to exhibit low tensile strength. Therefore, compression testing is often used on brittle materials such as concrete, metals, plastics, ceramics, composites, and corrugated materials like cardboard. These materials are often used in a load-bearing capacity where their integrity under compressive forces is critical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike tensile tests, which are usually conducted to determine the tensile properties of a specific material, compression tests are often performed on finished products. Common items such as tennis balls, golf balls, water bottles, protective cases, plastic pipes, and furniture are all examples of products that need to be evaluated for their compressive strength. For example, an engineer may want to conserve plastic by creating water bottles with thinner walls, but the bottles must still be strong enough to be packed in pallets and stacked on top of each other for transport. Compression testing can help the engineer fine tune the balance between product strength and material conservation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As long as the loads are sufficiently small (stresses less than the proportional limit), in many materials the relations outlined for tensile testing apply equally well in compression. The expression for deformation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (\delta) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from a given load &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \delta = \frac{FL}{AE} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
applies just as in tension, with negative values for δ and F indicating compression. Further, the modulus E is the same in tension and compression to a good approximation, and the stress-strain curve simply extends as a straight line into the third quadrant as shown below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are some practical difficulties in performing stress-strain tests in compression. If excessively large loads are mistakenly applied in a tensile test, perhaps by wrong settings on the testing machine, the specimen simply breaks and the test must be repeated with a new specimen. But in compression, a mistake can easily damage the load cell or other sensitive components, since even after specimen failure the loads are not necessarily relieved. This is why when designing a method for the Instron tester, there must always be a second stop condition at 28kN load. The ultimate compressive strength of a material is the value of compressive stress reached when the material fails completely. When brittle materials reach their ultimate compressive strength they are crushed, and the load drops drastically. Materials with higher ductility, (most plastics) do not rupture, but instead continue deforming  until the load is no longer being applied to the specimen, but rather between the two compression platens. In these cases, compressive strength can be reported as specific deformations such as 1%, 5%, or 10% of the test specimen&#039;s original height. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Instron&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Instron. (n.d.). What is Compression Testing? https://www.instron.us/en-us/our-company/library/test-types/compression-test. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bend Testing ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BendVMDiagram.PNG|thumb|Diagram of a three point bend test, with graphs of bending moment &#039;&#039;M&#039;&#039;, shear &#039;&#039;Q&#039;&#039; and deflection &#039;&#039;w&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Penn&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders. Three Point and Four Point Bending | Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders | Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. (n.d.). https://www.med.upenn.edu/pcmd/3pt-4pt-bending.html. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In bending tests, standardized, mostly cylindrical specimens are placed centrally on a test fixture. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;GOM&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Bending test: Suitable for both brittle and ductile materials. (n.d.). https://www.gom.com/en/topics/bend-test. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rounded support rollers (bearings) are arranged parallel to each other at a certain distance (support width). The diameter of the cylindrical specimen is proportional to the support width of the bearings. The test punch, which moves down slowly and at a constant speed, loads the sample with increasing force until it breaks or reaches the previously determined deformation. Flexural modulus (elastic modulus in bending), stress-strain behavior, and failure limits can all be obtained using a bend test. &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Bruker&amp;quot;&amp;gt; 3-Point Bend Testing. Bruker. (n.d.). https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/test-and-measurement/tribometers-and-mechanical-testers/3-point-bend-testing.html. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 3-point bending test is the most frequently performed bending test. However, it has the disadvantage that in addition to the compressive and tensile forces exerted, transverse forces are also effective in the material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the test, the values of the bending force and deflection are recorded, which are then used to determine the material characteristics. The test sequence is plotted in a stress-strain curve and can also be recorded with a video camera. Bending tests are performed to obtain information about the bending behavior of the tested material from the single-axis bending stress. In case of brittle materials, the bending strength is determined this way.  For ductile materials, the limit yield point, greatest possible bending angle, and Young’s modulus are determined. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of the flexural stress &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f = \frac{3 F L}{2 b d^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for a rectangular cross section&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f = \frac{F L}{\pi R^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for a circular cross section&amp;lt;ref name=Biomaterials&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Chapter 4 Mechanical Properties of Biomaterials&amp;quot;. Biomaterials – The intersection of Biology and Material Science. New Jersey, United States: Pearson Prentice Hall. 2008. p. 152.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of the flexural strain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f = \frac{6Dd}{L^2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calculation of flexural modulus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Zweben&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Zweben, C., W. S. Smith, and M. W. Wardle (1979), &amp;quot;Test methods for fiber tensile strength, composite flexural modulus, and properties of fabric-reinforced laminates&amp;quot;, Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fifth Conference), ASTM International&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f = \frac{L^3 m}{4 b d^3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in these formulas the following parameters are used:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = Stress in outer fibers at midpoint, (MPa)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = Strain in the outer surface, (mm/mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E_f&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  = flexural Modulus of elasticity,(MPa)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = load at a given point on the load deflection curve, (N)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Support span, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;b&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Width of test beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = Depth or thickness of tested beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = maximum deflection of the center of the beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = The gradient (i.e., slope) of the initial straight-line portion of the load deflection curve, (N/mm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;   = The radius of the beam, (mm)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a bending test, the bending stress is greatest in the center of the specimen (highest deflection). At this point, the greatest bending moment is always present. From the central pressure point, the bending moment decreases linearly in both directions toward the bearings. The material is subjected to pressure on its inner side and tension on its outer side. In the outer fibers of the specimen, the bending stress (tensile and compressive stress) is greatest and decreases inwards toward the neutral fiber. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If a partially plastically deformed specimen is relieved during the bending test by raising the test punch, only the internal stresses (residual stresses) present in the material and the resulting torque are still effective. This will partially reshape the sample.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bending Behavior of Ductile Materials ===&lt;br /&gt;
If the bending stress in the sample made of a ductile material is lower than the limit stress of the plastic deformation, the bending stress is exclusively elastic. As the bending stress increases, the yield strength is exceeded first in the peripheral areas of the specimen. These areas then deform plastically (the so-called material flow). The limit yield point is the limit bending stress up to which easily deformable materials can be loaded by bending without permanent deformation in the marginal area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moment this kind of deformation occurs can be determined directly from the deflection-force diagram, in a similar manner to how the yield strength is found in a tensile test. With deflection increasing steadily, more and more internal areas of the specimen are involved in the plastic deformation. This is a result of the stress increase. For steels, for example, the limit yield point is between 10 to 20 percent higher than the yield strength due to the linear stress increase. If the yield strength is exceeded in the edge fibers during the bending test, the inner and exclusively elastically stressed fibers impede the flow movement. Bending tests with ductile materials are different from those performed with brittle materials: Tough materials can be subjected to extreme plastic deformation, but they cannot be broken, no matter how strong the applied force is. Therefore, a bending test with a ductile sample is finished when the yield point is exceeded. The bending strength of ductile materials is determined by the point in time at which the plastic deformation occurs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bending Behavior of Brittle Materials ===&lt;br /&gt;
Specimens made of brittle materials show a different bending behavior during materials testing. They break without clearly visible material flow behavior. Therefore, the determination of the limit yield point is more complicated for brittle materials. In order to be able to determine the bending strength nevertheless, the maximum bending stress at which the sample breaks is determined. However, the bending strength is a fictitious value that is not identical to the bending stress actually occurring in the material. Another characteristic of bending tests with brittle materials is the fracture deflection. This technical term describes the greatest possible deflection of a specimen shortly before fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fracture deflection depends on the support width: Larger distances between the bearings allow for greater deflections. In order to check the strength of brittle materials, the bending test is often more suitable than the tensile test, because the materials are subjected to bending stress only. If this sample were to be subjected to a tensile test, it would break prematurely and measurement problems would occur. For certain brittle materials, the tensile test is therefore replaced by the bending test. These materials include thermosetting sheets and molding materials, thermoplastic injection molding compounds, and fiber-reinforced plastics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related Theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cyclic Loading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stress Theory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References == &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|meas]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39327</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39327"/>
		<updated>2025-06-14T18:25:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: fixed parse error&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |PhenomXL SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomxl-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Phenom ProX SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomprox-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:PhenomXL.png|center|250px]]||[[File:PhenomProX.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Magnification Range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||160x to 200,000x||80x to 130,000x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Accelerating Voltages&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| 4.8 kV to 20.5 kV (advanced mode)|| 5, 10, or 15 kV ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Feature Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| ~10nm || ~14nm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Detectors&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Secondary (SED) &amp;amp; Backscatter (BSD)||Backscatter only&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Capabilities&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| EDS, AIM, 3DRR || EDS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Sample Dimensions&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| max. 10 cm x 10 cm, 4 cm (h); or 36 stubs || max. 3.2 cm (ø), 3 cm (h)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) rasters an electron beam across a specific area on a sample, allowing for much higher magnifications compared to optical microscopy. The electrons are either elastically or inelastically reflected off the sample, then captured by detector(s) to yield an image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Electron Microscopy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron and optical microscopy share many fundamental components—specifically, a lens used to focus a specific type of source, and after either reflecting from or transmitting through the sample, a “signal” is then captured by a detector which processes inputs and spits out an image. In optical microscopy, an optical glass lens focuses photons from a lamp into either a digital camera or your eye. In electron microscopy, a series of variable magnetic fields serve as condenser lenses to vary the current and spot size of the electron beam (e-beam) generated from an electron gun. In SEM, this beam is then focused using an electromagnetic objective lens and rastered across the sample by a set of scan coils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to optical microscopy, electron microscopy also has both reflection and transmission modes—these are two separate imaging techniques known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)&#039;&#039;&#039; and  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Types of Electron Guns ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 main types of electron guns used in electron microscopy: thermionic (Schottky) emission and cold field emission. Both types required an electron source—typically this is either a single crystal of tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), or cerium hexaboride (CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Both Phenom SEMs at the MILL use thermionic emission guns with a CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software Features ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Automated Image Mapping (AIM)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEMs will raster beam over a larger area of a sample at a given magnification and automatically stitch the caputured images together.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;3D Roughness Reconstruction (3DRR)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEM will attempt to focus in a range of depths, then stitch together planes of features which are in focus to generate a 3D image representative of surface topology. This can be exported as an image or .stl file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magnification &amp;amp; Resolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs can provide an additional 2 orders of magnitude in magnification and resolution when compared to optical microscopes, which typically max out around 1,000x magnification and 200 nm resolution. SEMs typically have around 100,000x magnification and 2 nm resolution. This additional resolution is governed by the Abbe equation and de Broglie wave equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Abbe’s equation defines the theoretical maximum resolution of a microscope, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{k\lambda}{n\sin(\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k = 0.61&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an empirical constant, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the refractive index, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the aperture half-angle. The term in the denominator, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\sin{\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is also known as the &#039;&#039;numerical aperture&#039;&#039;, or nA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In optical microscopy, Abbe’s equation simplifies to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{nA}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the numerical aperture at high magnifications typically levels out at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;nA \approx 1.35&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for green light gives:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\cdot500\text{nm}}{1.35}=226\text{nm}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electron microscopy, the refractive index is typically 1, since the chamber is pumped down to near-vacuum conditions, and the aperture half-angle is typically very small. Using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation small-angle approximation], we can simplify Abbe’s equation to &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since electron microscopy uses an electron beam to image the sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is now the de Broglie wavelength of an electron. The de Broglie wave equation states:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda=\frac{h}{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is Planck’s constant and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is momentum. Recall that kinetic energy is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore p=mv=\sqrt{2m(\textrm{KE})}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopes such as SEMs typically have a controllable accelerating voltage—this term affects the kinetic energy of the e-beam by the fundamental relation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = e\textrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the elementary charge. Plugging in for momentum and kinetic energy, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2me\textrm{V}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, by plugging in all constants and assuming a small aperture half-angle of 0.01 rad (must use radians for small-angle approximation), the following resolutions can be obtained for varying accelerating voltages. Note that these calculations use Newtonian equations, not Einsteinian (relativistic) equations.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Accelerating Voltage (kV) !! de Broglie Wavelength (nm) !! Abbe Resolution (nm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || .0173 || 1.06&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || .0123 || .751&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15 || .0100 || .613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100 || .00388 pm || .237&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectronInteractionVolume.png|thumb|350px|right|Electron Interaction Volume with Matter (note: backscattered electrons should be abbreviated as BSE)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Claudionico / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the near-atomic resolution claimed by Abbe’s equation at higher accelerating voltages, SEMs struggle to reach beyond nanometer-level resolution, and therefore cannot see individual atoms. There are many variables which cause the reduction in practical resolution, so only major factors are listed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interaction Volume===&lt;br /&gt;
The first limitation is electron interaction volume. When a high energy electron beam strikes the sample, electrons penetrate the sample and knock free other electrons, ballooning into a relatively large interaction volume. The greater the accelerating voltage, the greater the interaction volume—therefore, SEMs must balance the improvement in theoretical Abbe resolution from a higher energy and the decrease in resolution from larger interaction volumes at high accelerating voltages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interaction volume typically has a diameter in the micron range for bulk samples and a diameter in the same order as sample thickness for thin foils used in TEM. This tiny interaction volume is also why extremely thin (&amp;lt;50nm) TEM foils can get down to atomic resolution. For SEM samples, noise and overlapping signals from different areas of a sample will blur an image if the accelerating voltage and interaction volume are too large. Ideally, interaction volume diameter should approximate the size of sample features to get sharp images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aberrations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aberrations occur when a lens fails to converge all rays at a single point and the image becomes out of focus. There are two types of aberrations: spherical and chromatic. In SEM, spherical aberrations occur when electrons near the edges of an electromagnetic lens are bent inconsistently compared to electrons at the center of the lens and fail to converge—this can be fixed by using a smaller aperture. Chromatic aberrations occur when the electron beam is not of uniform energy, causing the electromagnetic lens to bend electrons of differing energies to different points on the focal plane. Both of these phenomena derive their names from the same photon-based effects in optical microscopy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astigmatism===&lt;br /&gt;
Astigmatism in SEM occurs due to fluctuations in magnetic field strength, which may be caused by defects in the electron column core, source contamination, or magnetic samples. This typically results in the blurring or stretching of the SEM image, and can be corrected using stigmation coils. Most SEMs have both an X and Y stigmator knobs for correcting stretching, as well as an auto-stigmation feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Information Provided by SEM Emissions==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEM-EmissionMechanisms.png|350px|thumb|right|SE, BSE, and characteristic X-ray Emissions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© Rob Hurt / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
When primary electrons (PE) from the e-beam inelastically interact with electrons in the sample, they transfer a significant portion of their kinetic energy to another electron, which is then ejected as a secondary electron (SE). Other times, primary electrons can &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; around atomic nuclei and return while only losing a negligible amount of energy. This is an elastic interaction, and the returned primary electrons are redubbed backscattered electrons (BSD). While SE have energies in the 10s of eVs, BSE return with the same initial energy, which varies based on accelerating voltage (10 kV accelerating voltage &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Rightarrow&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; 10 keV of energy). Therefore, SEMs primarily handle 2 detectors used for imaging: these are the secondary electron detector (SED) and the backscattered electron detector (BSD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SED ===&lt;br /&gt;
Secondary electrons give an image which shows &#039;&#039;&#039;topographical&#039;&#039;&#039; features and a relatively large [[#Depth of Field|depth of field]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEs have such low energies, they can only escape when present in the sample&#039;s surface (the top several nm). This also means SEs have low interaction volume, and have resolutions on the nm level. The most common type of SED is the Everhart-Thornley (ET) detector, which are placed off-center from the sample to provide better contrast between SEs coming from different areas on the sample surface in exchange for slightly worse signal-to-noise ratio. The reasoning for sacrificing signal is because SE yields (# of emitted SEs per PE) are over 100%&amp;amp;mdash;this is because high-energy PEs undergoing inelastic interactions can dislodge multiple SEs at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== BSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Backscattered electrons give elemental contrast (Z-contrast), but by using a 4-quadrant detector, some topographical features are also resolvable. Turning off half of a 4-quadrant BSD works similarly to ET SEDs, where one side of sample will appear brighter than the other side. Note that these topographical modes do lose some Z-contrast in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BSEs are very high energy, and therefore penetrate deeper into the sample than SEs. This larger interaction volume results in BSD resolutions in the 100s of nm, 2 orders of magnitude worse than SEDs. Additionally, BSE yields are typically under 50% because they cannot &amp;quot;share&amp;quot; their initial energy and some BSEs become trapped in atomic orbitals. Z-contrast occurs because of increasing nucleus size through the periodic table&amp;amp;mdash;heavier nuclei will more effectively &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; PEs, result in greater counts for heavier atoms and lower counts for lighter atoms. This is typically displayed by making atomically heavier areas of the sample bright and atomically lighter areas of the sample dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, inelastic interactions which dislodge secondary electrons leave an electron vacancy which must be quenched, similar to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. The resulting vacancy is quenched, and the surplus energy is ejected as a secondary characteristic X-ray. Since energy drops between electrons levels in a given atom are discrete and distinct, a detector which can catch these secondary X-rays would be able to determine elemental composition. This is known as energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX), as is very common in SEM systems. Unlike XRF, secondary X-rays are only emitted from a small spot&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is sensitive to interaction volume, which is typically 1-2 μm in diameter for characteristic X-rays, with a spot size of a few nm. For comparison XRF depth ranges from several μm to a few mm, and irradiates the entire sample at once. This makes EDS &#039;&#039;slightly&#039;&#039; more surface sensitive, while XRF is more bulk sensitive. In SEM, rastering the e-beam source across the sample generates an EDS map, which is useful to measue elemental composition of specific surface features such as pores and inclusions, as well as compositional differeneces across grain boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EBSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a characterization technique found in some SEMs which gives detailed crystollographic information typically only available from techniques such as TEM or XRD. EBSD requires a crystalline sample polished to a flat surface to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of diffraction bands and lattice quality. The sample must also be highly tilted (~70º from horizontal) with respect to the diffraction camera (placed perpendicular to the e-beam) to increase diffraction contrast for the camera&#039;s phosphor screen, and the sample must be placed extremely close to the camera to increase signal (low working distance, WD &amp;lt; 5mm for most SEMs). The backscattered electrons which escape at this specific angle must follow the [[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)#Bragg&#039;s Law|Bragg diffraction condition]], resulting signal bands seen on the camera known as &#039;&#039;Kikuchi lines&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Kikuchi bands&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DOF-diagram.png|300px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of Field==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopy, specifically when detecting secondary electrons, has a superior depth of field compared to optical microscopy. Depth of field is a objective measure of the ability of a microscope to simultaneously focus at multiple depth&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is the &amp;quot;acceptable range&amp;quot; of depths where sample features are still in focus. Mathematically, depth of field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, can be approximated by:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\tan{\alpha}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the radius of the viewing spot, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is again the aperture half-angle. This formula can be confirmed upon inspection of the diagram to the right. This small aperture half-angle is what gives SEMs a much better depth of field that optical microscopes, whose aperture half angles are much larger. For SEMs, we can once again use the small-angle approximation to simplify this to:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since depth of field is subjective and based on the image itself, note that this viewing spot is actually the defined by the area on the sample which corresponds to a single pixel of the image. This area can therefore be calculated using the SEM&#039;s field of view, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{FOV}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the pixel width of the image, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{pix}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r=\frac{W_\textrm{FOV}}{W_\textrm{pix}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if given the image&#039;s actual pixel size (a constant diameter), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;P&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can define magnification, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, to be:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M=\frac{P}{2r} \rightarrow 2r=\frac{P}{M}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This shows that the size of the viewing spot depends on image magnification: therefore, magnification also affects the depth of field.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore D=\frac{P}{M\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From this equation, we can see that lowering either the aperture half-angle or the magnification will result in a greater depth of field in SEMs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Working Distance===&lt;br /&gt;
Since magnification cannot be changed if we want to continue to view small features, the aperture can be tweaked through the working distance, or WD. WD is the distance between the bottom pole piece of the objective lens and the specimen. Given the objective aperture radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=\frac{R}{\textrm{WD}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
WD typically falls between 5-9 mm when using secondary electron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Common SEM Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs run into several unavoidable issues which requires users to prepare and analyze samples more carefully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Charging===&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEMs blast a sample with electrons, samples will always charge wil imaging. The polarity of charge depends on the sample, but typically the sample emits more electrons than the number of incident primary electrons due to a SE yield of over 100%. Therefore, the sample becomes slightly positively charged. A charged sample results in several complications for SEM, whether positively or negatively charged. Charged samples will deflect both the primary e-beam at the surface and the emitted electrons. This disturbs focus, depth of field, and contrast, distorts and drifts the image, creates random dark and bright spots/streaks on the image, and in extreme cases, charging can even break parts of the specimen and damage the detector and source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid this, several precautions can be taken during sample prep and during analysis. Firstly, either carbon or copper tape should be used to afix the sample to the sample stub or holder so that the sample is grounded. This allows electrons to freely travel to fill electron-holes in the sample to maintain a neutral charge. Non-conductive samples should be coated with gold nanoparticles (see [[Sputter Coater]]) to make the sample conductive&amp;amp;mdash;this allows topographical features to still be visible, although it will dampen contrast in BSD images and muddle EDS with gold peaks. If BSD or EDS are wanted, the sample should instead be imaged at a low accelerating voltage on the SEM (5kV) and rastering speed should be increased to avoid significant charging at any one spot. Conductive samples simply need to be grounded to the sample stub or holder. For samples mounted in a hot mounting press, use a conductive mounting compound (such as conductive phenolic powders) or afix carbon or copper tape directly onto the sample surface and ground point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Etching===&lt;br /&gt;
When a higher energy e-beam rasters across one region for a prolonged duration, it may &amp;quot;etch&amp;quot; the sample by depositing a thin layer of residue. This residue comes from gases which were not pumped out by the vacuum, namely, hydrocarbons and water. High energy electrons can help water and carbon &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; ot the sample, and upon increasing your field of view in the imaging software, a darkened box may be visible on your sample—this is a sign of etching. This phenomena is especially prevalent at higher magnifications, where the beam continually rasters over an even smaller spot. This is unpreventable, but during analysis, it is recommended to not stay in one place for a long time and to keep moving around. When examining small features that require high magnification, focus on another small feature in the same plane as your feature, then move to your area of interest to avoid etching imporant areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Dangerous&amp;quot; Samples===&lt;br /&gt;
Any sample with loose particles may break under an intense e-beam and damage the detector and source&amp;amp;mdash;samples must be firmly attached to the sample stub or holder. Because lenses in electron microscopes are controlled using precise electromagnetic fields, magnetic samples may permamently damage the objective lens and are therefore not allowed in many SEMs. Porous samples suck as rock and concrete may contain trapped gases which may degas if put under high vacuum in the SEM. These gases may damage the detector and source, so samples should be degassed (and dried) before analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Theory &amp;amp; Techniques==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEM Colorization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Notation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|char]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39326</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39326"/>
		<updated>2025-06-13T19:47:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |PhenomXL SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomxl-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Phenom ProX SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomprox-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:PhenomXL.png|center|250px]]||[[File:PhenomProX.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Magnification Range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||160x to 200,000x||80x to 130,000x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Accelerating Voltages&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| 4.8 kV to 20.5 kV (advanced mode)|| 5, 10, or 15 kV ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Feature Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| ~10nm || ~14nm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Detectors&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Secondary (SED) &amp;amp; Backscatter (BSD)||Backscatter only&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Capabilities&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| EDS, AIM, 3DRR || EDS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Sample Dimensions&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| max. 10 cm x 10 cm, 4 cm (h); or 36 stubs || max. 3.2 cm (ø), 3 cm (h)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) rasters an electron beam across a specific area on a sample, allowing for much higher magnifications compared to optical microscopy. The electrons are either elastically or inelastically reflected off the sample, then captured by detector(s) to yield an image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Electron Microscopy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron and optical microscopy share many fundamental components—specifically, a lens used to focus a specific type of source, and after either reflecting from or transmitting through the sample, a “signal” is then captured by a detector which processes inputs and spits out an image. In optical microscopy, an optical glass lens focuses photons from a lamp into either a digital camera or your eye. In electron microscopy, a series of variable magnetic fields serve as condenser lenses to vary the current and spot size of the electron beam (e-beam) generated from an electron gun. In SEM, this beam is then focused using an electromagnetic objective lens and rastered across the sample by a set of scan coils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to optical microscopy, electron microscopy also has both reflection and transmission modes—these are two separate imaging techniques known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)&#039;&#039;&#039; and  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Types of Electron Guns ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 main types of electron guns used in electron microscopy: thermionic (Schottky) emission and cold field emission. Both types required an electron source—typically this is either a single crystal of tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), or cerium hexaboride (CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Both Phenom SEMs at the MILL use thermionic emission guns with a CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software Features ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Automated Image Mapping (AIM)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEMs will raster beam over a larger area of a sample at a given magnification and automatically stitch the caputured images together.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;3D Roughness Reconstruction (3DRR)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEM will attempt to focus in a range of depths, then stitch together planes of features which are in focus to generate a 3D image representative of surface topology. This can be exported as an image or .stl file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magnification &amp;amp; Resolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs can provide an additional 2 orders of magnitude in magnification and resolution when compared to optical microscopes, which typically max out around 1,000x magnification and 200 nm resolution. SEMs typically have around 100,000x magnification and 2 nm resolution. This additional resolution is governed by the Abbe equation and de Broglie wave equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Abbe’s equation defines the theoretical maximum resolution of a microscope, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{k\lambda}{n\sin(\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k = 0.61&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an empirical constant, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the refractive index, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the aperture half-angle. The term in the denominator, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\sin{\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is also known as the &#039;&#039;numerical aperture&#039;&#039;, or nA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In optical microscopy, Abbe’s equation simplifies to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{nA}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the numerical aperture at high magnifications typically levels out at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;nA \approx 1.35&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for green light gives:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\cdot500\textrm{nm}}{1.35}=226\textnormal{nm}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electron microscopy, the refractive index is typically 1, since the chamber is pumped down to near-vacuum conditions, and the aperture half-angle is typically very small. Using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation small-angle approximation], we can simplify Abbe’s equation to &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since electron microscopy uses an electron beam to image the sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is now the de Broglie wavelength of an electron. The de Broglie wave equation states:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda=\frac{h}{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is Planck’s constant and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is momentum. Recall that kinetic energy is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore p=mv=\sqrt{2m(\textrm{KE})}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopes such as SEMs typically have a controllable accelerating voltage—this term affects the kinetic energy of the e-beam by the fundamental relation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = e\textrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the elementary charge. Plugging in for momentum and kinetic energy, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2me\textrm{V}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, by plugging in all constants and assuming a small aperture half-angle of 0.01 rad (must use radians for small-angle approximation), the following resolutions can be obtained for varying accelerating voltages. Note that these calculations use Newtonian equations, not Einsteinian (relativistic) equations.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Accelerating Voltage (kV) !! de Broglie Wavelength (nm) !! Abbe Resolution (nm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || .0173 || 1.06&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || .0123 || .751&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15 || .0100 || .613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100 || .00388 pm || .237&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectronInteractionVolume.png|thumb|350px|right|Electron Interaction Volume with Matter (note: backscattered electrons should be abbreviated as BSE)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Claudionico / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the near-atomic resolution claimed by Abbe’s equation at higher accelerating voltages, SEMs struggle to reach beyond nanometer-level resolution, and therefore cannot see individual atoms. There are many variables which cause the reduction in practical resolution, so only major factors are listed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interaction Volume===&lt;br /&gt;
The first limitation is electron interaction volume. When a high energy electron beam strikes the sample, electrons penetrate the sample and knock free other electrons, ballooning into a relatively large interaction volume. The greater the accelerating voltage, the greater the interaction volume—therefore, SEMs must balance the improvement in theoretical Abbe resolution from a higher energy and the decrease in resolution from larger interaction volumes at high accelerating voltages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interaction volume typically has a diameter in the micron range for bulk samples and a diameter in the same order as sample thickness for thin foils used in TEM. This tiny interaction volume is also why extremely thin (&amp;lt;50nm) TEM foils can get down to atomic resolution. For SEM samples, noise and overlapping signals from different areas of a sample will blur an image if the accelerating voltage and interaction volume are too large. Ideally, interaction volume diameter should approximate the size of sample features to get sharp images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aberrations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aberrations occur when a lens fails to converge all rays at a single point and the image becomes out of focus. There are two types of aberrations: spherical and chromatic. In SEM, spherical aberrations occur when electrons near the edges of an electromagnetic lens are bent inconsistently compared to electrons at the center of the lens and fail to converge—this can be fixed by using a smaller aperture. Chromatic aberrations occur when the electron beam is not of uniform energy, causing the electromagnetic lens to bend electrons of differing energies to different points on the focal plane. Both of these phenomena derive their names from the same photon-based effects in optical microscopy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astigmatism===&lt;br /&gt;
Astigmatism in SEM occurs due to fluctuations in magnetic field strength, which may be caused by defects in the electron column core, source contamination, or magnetic samples. This typically results in the blurring or stretching of the SEM image, and can be corrected using stigmation coils. Most SEMs have both an X and Y stigmator knobs for correcting stretching, as well as an auto-stigmation feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Information Provided by SEM Emissions==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEM-EmissionMechanisms.png|350px|thumb|right|SE, BSE, and characteristic X-ray Emissions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© Rob Hurt / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
When primary electrons (PE) from the e-beam inelastically interact with electrons in the sample, they transfer a significant portion of their kinetic energy to another electron, which is then ejected as a secondary electron (SE). Other times, primary electrons can &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; around atomic nuclei and return while only losing a negligible amount of energy. This is an elastic interaction, and the returned primary electrons are redubbed backscattered electrons (BSD). While SE have energies in the 10s of eVs, BSE return with the same initial energy, which varies based on accelerating voltage (10 kV accelerating voltage &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Rightarrow&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; 10 keV of energy). Therefore, SEMs primarily handle 2 detectors used for imaging: these are the secondary electron detector (SED) and the backscattered electron detector (BSD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SED ===&lt;br /&gt;
Secondary electrons give an image which shows &#039;&#039;&#039;topographical&#039;&#039;&#039; features and a relatively large [[#Depth of Field|depth of field]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEs have such low energies, they can only escape when present in the sample&#039;s surface (the top several nm). This also means SEs have low interaction volume, and have resolutions on the nm level. The most common type of SED is the Everhart-Thornley (ET) detector, which are placed off-center from the sample to provide better contrast between SEs coming from different areas on the sample surface in exchange for slightly worse signal-to-noise ratio. The reasoning for sacrificing signal is because SE yields (# of emitted SEs per PE) are over 100%&amp;amp;mdash;this is because high-energy PEs undergoing inelastic interactions can dislodge multiple SEs at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== BSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Backscattered electrons give elemental contrast (Z-contrast), but by using a 4-quadrant detector, some topographical features are also resolvable. Turning off half of a 4-quadrant BSD works similarly to ET SEDs, where one side of sample will appear brighter than the other side. Note that these topographical modes do lose some Z-contrast in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BSEs are very high energy, and therefore penetrate deeper into the sample than SEs. This larger interaction volume results in BSD resolutions in the 100s of nm, 2 orders of magnitude worse than SEDs. Additionally, BSE yields are typically under 50% because they cannot &amp;quot;share&amp;quot; their initial energy and some BSEs become trapped in atomic orbitals. Z-contrast occurs because of increasing nucleus size through the periodic table&amp;amp;mdash;heavier nuclei will more effectively &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; PEs, result in greater counts for heavier atoms and lower counts for lighter atoms. This is typically displayed by making atomically heavier areas of the sample bright and atomically lighter areas of the sample dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, inelastic interactions which dislodge secondary electrons leave an electron vacancy which must be quenched, similar to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. The resulting vacancy is quenched, and the surplus energy is ejected as a secondary characteristic X-ray. Since energy drops between electrons levels in a given atom are discrete and distinct, a detector which can catch these secondary X-rays would be able to determine elemental composition. This is known as energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX), as is very common in SEM systems. Unlike XRF, secondary X-rays are only emitted from a small spot&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is sensitive to interaction volume, which is typically 1-2 μm in diameter for characteristic X-rays, with a spot size of a few nm. For comparison XRF depth ranges from several μm to a few mm, and irradiates the entire sample at once. This makes EDS &#039;&#039;slightly&#039;&#039; more surface sensitive, while XRF is more bulk sensitive. In SEM, rastering the e-beam source across the sample generates an EDS map, which is useful to measue elemental composition of specific surface features such as pores and inclusions, as well as compositional differeneces across grain boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EBSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a characterization technique found in some SEMs which gives detailed crystollographic information typically only available from techniques such as TEM or XRD. EBSD requires a crystalline sample polished to a flat surface to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of diffraction bands and lattice quality. The sample must also be highly tilted (~70º from horizontal) with respect to the diffraction camera (placed perpendicular to the e-beam) to increase diffraction contrast for the camera&#039;s phosphor screen, and the sample must be placed extremely close to the camera to increase signal (low working distance, WD &amp;lt; 5mm for most SEMs). The backscattered electrons which escape at this specific angle must follow the [[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)#Bragg&#039;s Law|Bragg diffraction condition]], resulting signal bands seen on the camera known as &#039;&#039;Kikuchi lines&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Kikuchi bands&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DOF-diagram.png|300px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of Field==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopy, specifically when detecting secondary electrons, has a superior depth of field compared to optical microscopy. Depth of field is a objective measure of the ability of a microscope to simultaneously focus at multiple depth&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is the &amp;quot;acceptable range&amp;quot; of depths where sample features are still in focus. Mathematically, depth of field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, can be approximated by:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\tan{\alpha}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the radius of the viewing spot, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is again the aperture half-angle. This formula can be confirmed upon inspection of the diagram to the right. This small aperture half-angle is what gives SEMs a much better depth of field that optical microscopes, whose aperture half angles are much larger. For SEMs, we can once again use the small-angle approximation to simplify this to:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since depth of field is subjective and based on the image itself, note that this viewing spot is actually the defined by the area on the sample which corresponds to a single pixel of the image. This area can therefore be calculated using the SEM&#039;s field of view, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{FOV}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the pixel width of the image, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{pix}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r=\frac{W_\textrm{FOV}}{W_\textrm{pix}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if given the image&#039;s actual pixel size (a constant diameter), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;P&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can define magnification, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, to be:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M=\frac{P}{2r} \rightarrow 2r=\frac{P}{M}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This shows that the size of the viewing spot depends on image magnification: therefore, magnification also affects the depth of field.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore D=\frac{P}{M\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From this equation, we can see that lowering either the aperture half-angle or the magnification will result in a greater depth of field in SEMs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Working Distance===&lt;br /&gt;
Since magnification cannot be changed if we want to continue to view small features, the aperture can be tweaked through the working distance, or WD. WD is the distance between the bottom pole piece of the objective lens and the specimen. Given the objective aperture radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=\frac{R}{\textrm{WD}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
WD typically falls between 5-9 mm when using secondary electron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Common SEM Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs run into several unavoidable issues which requires users to prepare and analyze samples more carefully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Charging===&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEMs blast a sample with electrons, samples will always charge wil imaging. The polarity of charge depends on the sample, but typically the sample emits more electrons than the number of incident primary electrons due to a SE yield of over 100%. Therefore, the sample becomes slightly positively charged. A charged sample results in several complications for SEM, whether positively or negatively charged. Charged samples will deflect both the primary e-beam at the surface and the emitted electrons. This disturbs focus, depth of field, and contrast, distorts and drifts the image, creates random dark and bright spots/streaks on the image, and in extreme cases, charging can even break parts of the specimen and damage the detector and source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid this, several precautions can be taken during sample prep and during analysis. Firstly, either carbon or copper tape should be used to afix the sample to the sample stub or holder so that the sample is grounded. This allows electrons to freely travel to fill electron-holes in the sample to maintain a neutral charge. Non-conductive samples should be coated with gold nanoparticles (see [[Sputter Coater]]) to make the sample conductive&amp;amp;mdash;this allows topographical features to still be visible, although it will dampen contrast in BSD images and muddle EDS with gold peaks. If BSD or EDS are wanted, the sample should instead be imaged at a low accelerating voltage on the SEM (5kV) and rastering speed should be increased to avoid significant charging at any one spot. Conductive samples simply need to be grounded to the sample stub or holder. For samples mounted in a hot mounting press, use a conductive mounting compound (such as conductive phenolic powders) or afix carbon or copper tape directly onto the sample surface and ground point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Etching===&lt;br /&gt;
When a higher energy e-beam rasters across one region for a prolonged duration, it may &amp;quot;etch&amp;quot; the sample by depositing a thin layer of residue. This residue comes from gases which were not pumped out by the vacuum, namely, hydrocarbons and water. High energy electrons can help water and carbon &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; ot the sample, and upon increasing your field of view in the imaging software, a darkened box may be visible on your sample—this is a sign of etching. This phenomena is especially prevalent at higher magnifications, where the beam continually rasters over an even smaller spot. This is unpreventable, but during analysis, it is recommended to not stay in one place for a long time and to keep moving around. When examining small features that require high magnification, focus on another small feature in the same plane as your feature, then move to your area of interest to avoid etching imporant areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Dangerous&amp;quot; Samples===&lt;br /&gt;
Any sample with loose particles may break under an intense e-beam and damage the detector and source&amp;amp;mdash;samples must be firmly attached to the sample stub or holder. Because lenses in electron microscopes are controlled using precise electromagnetic fields, magnetic samples may permamently damage the objective lens and are therefore not allowed in many SEMs. Porous samples suck as rock and concrete may contain trapped gases which may degas if put under high vacuum in the SEM. These gases may damage the detector and source, so samples should be degassed (and dried) before analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Theory &amp;amp; Techniques==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEM Colorization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Notation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|char]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39325</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39325"/>
		<updated>2025-06-11T17:41:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |PhenomXL SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomxl-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Phenom ProX SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomprox-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:PhenomXL.png|center|250px]]||[[File:PhenomProX.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Magnification Range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||160x to 200,000x||80x to 130,000x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Accelerating Voltages&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| 4.8 kV to 20.5 kV (advanced mode)|| 5, 10, or 15 kV ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Feature Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| ~10nm || ~14nm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Detectors&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Secondary (SED) &amp;amp; Backscatter (BSD)||Backscatter only&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Capabilities&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| EDS, AIM, 3DRR || EDS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Sample Dimensions&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| max. 10 cm x 10 cm, 4 cm (h); or 36 stubs || max. 3.2 cm (ø), 3 cm (h)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) rasters an electron beam across a specific area on a sample, allowing for much higher magnifications compared to optical microscopy. The electrons are either elastically or inelastically reflected off the sample, then captured by detector(s) to yield an image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Electron Microscopy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron and optical microscopy share many fundamental components—specifically, a lens used to focus a specific type of source, and after either reflecting from or transmitting through the sample, a “signal” is then captured by a detector which processes inputs and spits out an image. In optical microscopy, an optical glass lens focuses photons from a lamp into either a digital camera or your eye. In electron microscopy, a series of variable magnetic fields serve as condenser lenses to vary the current and spot size of the electron beam (e-beam) generated from an electron gun. In SEM, this beam is then focused using an electromagnetic objective lens and rastered across the sample by a set of scan coils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to optical microscopy, electron microscopy also has both reflection and transmission modes—these are two separate imaging techniques known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)&#039;&#039;&#039; and  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Types of Electron Guns ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 main types of electron guns used in electron microscopy: thermionic (Schottky) emission and cold field emission. Both types required an electron source—typically this is either a single crystal of tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), or cerium hexaboride (CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Both Phenom SEMs at the MILL use thermionic emission guns with a CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software Features ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Automated Image Mapping (AIM)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEMs will raster beam over a larger area of a sample at a given magnification and automatically stitch the caputured images together.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;3D Roughness Reconstruction (3DRR)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEM will attempt to focus in a range of depths, then stitch together planes of features which are in focus to generate a 3D image representative of surface topology. This can be exported as an image or .stl file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magnification &amp;amp; Resolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs can provide an additional 2 orders of magnitude in magnification and resolution when compared to optical microscopes, which typically max out around 1,000x magnification and 200 nm resolution. SEMs typically have around 100,000x magnification and 2 nm resolution. This additional resolution is governed by the Abbe equation and de Broglie wave equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Abbe’s equation defines the theoretical maximum resolution of a microscope, &amp;amp;delta; as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AbbeEquation.png|90px]],&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where k = 0.61 is an empirical constant, n is the refractive index, and &amp;amp;alpha; is the aperture half-angle. The term in the denominator, nsin(&amp;amp;alpha;), is also known as the &#039;&#039;numerical aperture&#039;&#039;, or nA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In optical microscopy, Abbe’s equation simplifies to [[File:simAbbeEq.png]], where the numerical aperture at high magnifications typically levels out at nA ~ 1.35. Plugging in the &amp;amp;lambda; for green light gives:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\cdot500\textrm{nm}}{1.35}=226\textnormal{nm}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electron microscopy, the refractive index is typically 1, since the chamber is pumped down to near-vacuum conditions, and the aperture half-angle is typically very small. Using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation small-angle approximation], we can simplify Abbe’s equation to &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since electron microscopy uses an electron beam to image the sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is now the de Broglie wavelength of an electron. The de Broglie wave equation states:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda=\frac{h}{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is Planck’s constant and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is momentum. Recall that kinetic energy is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore p=mv=\sqrt{2m(\textrm{KE})}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopes such as SEMs typically have a controllable accelerating voltage—this term affects the kinetic energy of the e-beam by the fundamental relation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = e\textrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the elementary charge. Plugging in for momentum and kinetic energy, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2me\textrm{V}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, by plugging in all constants and assuming a small aperture half-angle of 0.01 rad (must use radians for small-angle approximation), the following resolutions can be obtained for varying accelerating voltages. Note that these calculations use Newtonian equations, not Einsteinian (relativistic) equations.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Accelerating Voltage (kV) !! de Broglie Wavelength (nm) !! Abbe Resolution (nm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || .0173 || 1.06&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || .0123 || .751&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15 || .0100 || .613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100 || .00388 pm || .237&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectronInteractionVolume.png|thumb|350px|right|Electron Interaction Volume with Matter (note: backscattered electrons should be abbreviated as BSE)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Claudionico / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the near-atomic resolution claimed by Abbe’s equation at higher accelerating voltages, SEMs struggle to reach beyond nanometer-level resolution, and therefore cannot see individual atoms. There are many variables which cause the reduction in practical resolution, so only major factors are listed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interaction Volume===&lt;br /&gt;
The first limitation is electron interaction volume. When a high energy electron beam strikes the sample, electrons penetrate the sample and knock free other electrons, ballooning into a relatively large interaction volume. The greater the accelerating voltage, the greater the interaction volume—therefore, SEMs must balance the improvement in theoretical Abbe resolution from a higher energy and the decrease in resolution from larger interaction volumes at high accelerating voltages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interaction volume typically has a diameter in the micron range for bulk samples and a diameter in the same order as sample thickness for thin foils used in TEM. This tiny interaction volume is also why extremely thin (&amp;lt;50nm) TEM foils can get down to atomic resolution. For SEM samples, noise and overlapping signals from different areas of a sample will blur an image if the accelerating voltage and interaction volume are too large. Ideally, interaction volume diameter should approximate the size of sample features to get sharp images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aberrations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aberrations occur when a lens fails to converge all rays at a single point and the image becomes out of focus. There are two types of aberrations: spherical and chromatic. In SEM, spherical aberrations occur when electrons near the edges of an electromagnetic lens are bent inconsistently compared to electrons at the center of the lens and fail to converge—this can be fixed by using a smaller aperture. Chromatic aberrations occur when the electron beam is not of uniform energy, causing the electromagnetic lens to bend electrons of differing energies to different points on the focal plane. Both of these phenomena derive their names from the same photon-based effects in optical microscopy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astigmatism===&lt;br /&gt;
Astigmatism in SEM occurs due to fluctuations in magnetic field strength, which may be caused by defects in the electron column core, source contamination, or magnetic samples. This typically results in the blurring or stretching of the SEM image, and can be corrected using stigmation coils. Most SEMs have both an X and Y stigmator knobs for correcting stretching, as well as an auto-stigmation feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Information Provided by SEM Emissions==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEM-EmissionMechanisms.png|350px|thumb|right|SE, BSE, and characteristic X-ray Emissions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© Rob Hurt / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
When primary electrons (PE) from the e-beam inelastically interact with electrons in the sample, they transfer a significant portion of their kinetic energy to another electron, which is then ejected as a secondary electron (SE). Other times, primary electrons can &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; around atomic nuclei and return while only losing a negligible amount of energy. This is an elastic interaction, and the returned primary electrons are redubbed backscattered electrons (BSD). While SE have energies in the 10s of eVs, BSE return with the same initial energy, which varies based on accelerating voltage (10 kV accelerating voltage &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Rightarrow&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; 10 keV of energy). Therefore, SEMs primarily handle 2 detectors used for imaging: these are the secondary electron detector (SED) and the backscattered electron detector (BSD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SED ===&lt;br /&gt;
Secondary electrons give an image which shows &#039;&#039;&#039;topographical&#039;&#039;&#039; features and a relatively large [[#Depth of Field|depth of field]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEs have such low energies, they can only escape when present in the sample&#039;s surface (the top several nm). This also means SEs have low interaction volume, and have resolutions on the nm level. The most common type of SED is the Everhart-Thornley (ET) detector, which are placed off-center from the sample to provide better contrast between SEs coming from different areas on the sample surface in exchange for slightly worse signal-to-noise ratio. The reasoning for sacrificing signal is because SE yields (# of emitted SEs per PE) are over 100%&amp;amp;mdash;this is because high-energy PEs undergoing inelastic interactions can dislodge multiple SEs at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== BSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Backscattered electrons give elemental contrast (Z-contrast), but by using a 4-quadrant detector, some topographical features are also resolvable. Turning off half of a 4-quadrant BSD works similarly to ET SEDs, where one side of sample will appear brighter than the other side. Note that these topographical modes do lose some Z-contrast in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BSEs are very high energy, and therefore penetrate deeper into the sample than SEs. This larger interaction volume results in BSD resolutions in the 100s of nm, 2 orders of magnitude worse than SEDs. Additionally, BSE yields are typically under 50% because they cannot &amp;quot;share&amp;quot; their initial energy and some BSEs become trapped in atomic orbitals. Z-contrast occurs because of increasing nucleus size through the periodic table&amp;amp;mdash;heavier nuclei will more effectively &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; PEs, result in greater counts for heavier atoms and lower counts for lighter atoms. This is typically displayed by making atomically heavier areas of the sample bright and atomically lighter areas of the sample dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, inelastic interactions which dislodge secondary electrons leave an electron vacancy which must be quenched, similar to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. The resulting vacancy is quenched, and the surplus energy is ejected as a secondary characteristic X-ray. Since energy drops between electrons levels in a given atom are discrete and distinct, a detector which can catch these secondary X-rays would be able to determine elemental composition. This is known as energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX), as is very common in SEM systems. Unlike XRF, secondary X-rays are only emitted from a small spot&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is sensitive to interaction volume, which is typically 1-2 μm in diameter for characteristic X-rays, with a spot size of a few nm. For comparison XRF depth ranges from several μm to a few mm, and irradiates the entire sample at once. This makes EDS &#039;&#039;slightly&#039;&#039; more surface sensitive, while XRF is more bulk sensitive. In SEM, rastering the e-beam source across the sample generates an EDS map, which is useful to measue elemental composition of specific surface features such as pores and inclusions, as well as compositional differeneces across grain boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EBSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a characterization technique found in some SEMs which gives detailed crystollographic information typically only available from techniques such as TEM or XRD. EBSD requires a crystalline sample polished to a flat surface to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of diffraction bands and lattice quality. The sample must also be highly tilted (~70º from horizontal) with respect to the diffraction camera (placed perpendicular to the e-beam) to increase diffraction contrast for the camera&#039;s phosphor screen, and the sample must be placed extremely close to the camera to increase signal (low working distance, WD &amp;lt; 5mm for most SEMs). The backscattered electrons which escape at this specific angle must follow the [[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)#Bragg&#039;s Law|Bragg diffraction condition]], resulting signal bands seen on the camera known as &#039;&#039;Kikuchi lines&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Kikuchi bands&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DOF-diagram.png|300px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of Field==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopy, specifically when detecting secondary electrons, has a superior depth of field compared to optical microscopy. Depth of field is a objective measure of the ability of a microscope to simultaneously focus at multiple depth&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is the &amp;quot;acceptable range&amp;quot; of depths where sample features are still in focus. Mathematically, depth of field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, can be approximated by:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\tan{\alpha}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the radius of the viewing spot, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is again the aperture half-angle. This formula can be confirmed upon inspection of the diagram to the right. This small aperture half-angle is what gives SEMs a much better depth of field that optical microscopes, whose aperture half angles are much larger. For SEMs, we can once again use the small-angle approximation to simplify this to:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since depth of field is subjective and based on the image itself, note that this viewing spot is actually the defined by the area on the sample which corresponds to a single pixel of the image. This area can therefore be calculated using the SEM&#039;s field of view, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{FOV}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the pixel width of the image, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{pix}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r=\frac{W_\textrm{FOV}}{W_\textrm{pix}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if given the image&#039;s actual pixel size (a constant diameter), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;P&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can define magnification, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, to be:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M=\frac{P}{2r} \rightarrow 2r=\frac{P}{M}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This shows that the size of the viewing spot depends on image magnification: therefore, magnification also affects the depth of field.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore D=\frac{P}{M\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From this equation, we can see that lowering either the aperture half-angle or the magnification will result in a greater depth of field in SEMs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Working Distance===&lt;br /&gt;
Since magnification cannot be changed if we want to continue to view small features, the aperture can be tweaked through the working distance, or WD. WD is the distance between the bottom pole piece of the objective lens and the specimen. Given the objective aperture radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=\frac{R}{\textrm{WD}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
WD typically falls between 5-9 mm when using secondary electron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Common SEM Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs run into several unavoidable issues which requires users to prepare and analyze samples more carefully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Charging===&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEMs blast a sample with electrons, samples will always charge wil imaging. The polarity of charge depends on the sample, but typically the sample emits more electrons than the number of incident primary electrons due to a SE yield of over 100%. Therefore, the sample becomes slightly positively charged. A charged sample results in several complications for SEM, whether positively or negatively charged. Charged samples will deflect both the primary e-beam at the surface and the emitted electrons. This disturbs focus, depth of field, and contrast, distorts and drifts the image, creates random dark and bright spots/streaks on the image, and in extreme cases, charging can even break parts of the specimen and damage the detector and source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid this, several precautions can be taken during sample prep and during analysis. Firstly, either carbon or copper tape should be used to afix the sample to the sample stub or holder so that the sample is grounded. This allows electrons to freely travel to fill electron-holes in the sample to maintain a neutral charge. Non-conductive samples should be coated with gold nanoparticles (see [[Sputter Coater]]) to make the sample conductive&amp;amp;mdash;this allows topographical features to still be visible, although it will dampen contrast in BSD images and muddle EDS with gold peaks. If BSD or EDS are wanted, the sample should instead be imaged at a low accelerating voltage on the SEM (5kV) and rastering speed should be increased to avoid significant charging at any one spot. Conductive samples simply need to be grounded to the sample stub or holder. For samples mounted in a hot mounting press, use a conductive mounting compound (such as conductive phenolic powders) or afix carbon or copper tape directly onto the sample surface and ground point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Etching===&lt;br /&gt;
When a higher energy e-beam rasters across one region for a prolonged duration, it may &amp;quot;etch&amp;quot; the sample by depositing a thin layer of residue. This residue comes from gases which were not pumped out by the vacuum, namely, hydrocarbons and water. High energy electrons can help water and carbon &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; ot the sample, and upon increasing your field of view in the imaging software, a darkened box may be visible on your sample—this is a sign of etching. This phenomena is especially prevalent at higher magnifications, where the beam continually rasters over an even smaller spot. This is unpreventable, but during analysis, it is recommended to not stay in one place for a long time and to keep moving around. When examining small features that require high magnification, focus on another small feature in the same plane as your feature, then move to your area of interest to avoid etching imporant areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Dangerous&amp;quot; Samples===&lt;br /&gt;
Any sample with loose particles may break under an intense e-beam and damage the detector and source&amp;amp;mdash;samples must be firmly attached to the sample stub or holder. Because lenses in electron microscopes are controlled using precise electromagnetic fields, magnetic samples may permamently damage the objective lens and are therefore not allowed in many SEMs. Porous samples suck as rock and concrete may contain trapped gases which may degas if put under high vacuum in the SEM. These gases may damage the detector and source, so samples should be degassed (and dried) before analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Theory &amp;amp; Techniques==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEM Colorization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Notation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|char]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:AbbeEquation.png&amp;diff=39324</id>
		<title>File:AbbeEquation.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=File:AbbeEquation.png&amp;diff=39324"/>
		<updated>2025-06-11T13:53:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39323</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39323"/>
		<updated>2025-06-10T15:27:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |PhenomXL SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomxl-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Phenom ProX SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomprox-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:PhenomXL.png|center|250px]]||[[File:PhenomProX.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Magnification Range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||160x to 200,000x||80x to 130,000x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Accelerating Voltages&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| 4.8 kV to 20.5 kV (advanced mode)|| 5, 10, or 15 kV ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Feature Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| ~10nm || ~14nm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Detectors&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Secondary (SED) &amp;amp; Backscatter (BSD)||Backscatter only&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Capabilities&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| EDS, AIM, 3DRR || EDS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Sample Dimensions&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| max. 10 cm x 10 cm, 4 cm (h); or 36 stubs || max. 3.2 cm (ø), 3 cm (h)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) rasters an electron beam across a specific area on a sample, allowing for much higher magnifications compared to optical microscopy. The electrons are either elastically or inelastically reflected off the sample, then captured by detector(s) to yield an image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Electron Microscopy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron and optical microscopy share many fundamental components—specifically, a lens used to focus a specific type of source, and after either reflecting from or transmitting through the sample, a “signal” is then captured by a detector which processes inputs and spits out an image. In optical microscopy, an optical glass lens focuses photons from a lamp into either a digital camera or your eye. In electron microscopy, a series of variable magnetic fields serve as condenser lenses to vary the current and spot size of the electron beam (e-beam) generated from an electron gun. In SEM, this beam is then focused using an electromagnetic objective lens and rastered across the sample by a set of scan coils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to optical microscopy, electron microscopy also has both reflection and transmission modes—these are two separate imaging techniques known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)&#039;&#039;&#039; and  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Types of Electron Guns ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 main types of electron guns used in electron microscopy: thermionic (Schottky) emission and cold field emission. Both types required an electron source—typically this is either a single crystal of tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), or cerium hexaboride (CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Both Phenom SEMs at the MILL use thermionic emission guns with a CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software Features ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Automated Image Mapping (AIM)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEMs will raster beam over a larger area of a sample at a given magnification and automatically stitch the caputured images together.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;3D Roughness Reconstruction (3DRR)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEM will attempt to focus in a range of depths, then stitch together planes of features which are in focus to generate a 3D image representative of surface topology. This can be exported as an image or .stl file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magnification &amp;amp; Resolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs can provide an additional 2 orders of magnitude in magnification and resolution when compared to optical microscopes, which typically max out around 1,000x magnification and 200 nm resolution. SEMs typically have around 100,000x magnification and 2 nm resolution. This additional resolution is governed by the Abbe equation and de Broglie wave equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Abbe’s equation defines the theoretical maximum resolution of a microscope, &amp;amp;delta; as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{k\lambda}{n\sin(\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k = 0.61&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an empirical constant, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the refractive index, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the aperture half-angle. The term in the denominator, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\sin{\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is also known as the &#039;&#039;numerical aperture&#039;&#039;, or nA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In optical microscopy, Abbe’s equation simplifies to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{nA}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the numerical aperture at high magnifications typically levels out at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;nA \approx 1.35&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for green light gives:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\cdot500\textrm{nm}}{1.35}=226\textnormal{nm}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electron microscopy, the refractive index is typically 1, since the chamber is pumped down to near-vacuum conditions, and the aperture half-angle is typically very small. Using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation small-angle approximation], we can simplify Abbe’s equation to &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since electron microscopy uses an electron beam to image the sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is now the de Broglie wavelength of an electron. The de Broglie wave equation states:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda=\frac{h}{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is Planck’s constant and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is momentum. Recall that kinetic energy is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore p=mv=\sqrt{2m(\textrm{KE})}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopes such as SEMs typically have a controllable accelerating voltage—this term affects the kinetic energy of the e-beam by the fundamental relation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = e\textrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the elementary charge. Plugging in for momentum and kinetic energy, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2me\textrm{V}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, by plugging in all constants and assuming a small aperture half-angle of 0.01 rad (must use radians for small-angle approximation), the following resolutions can be obtained for varying accelerating voltages. Note that these calculations use Newtonian equations, not Einsteinian (relativistic) equations.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Accelerating Voltage (kV) !! de Broglie Wavelength (nm) !! Abbe Resolution (nm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || .0173 || 1.06&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || .0123 || .751&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15 || .0100 || .613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100 || .00388 pm || .237&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectronInteractionVolume.png|thumb|350px|right|Electron Interaction Volume with Matter (note: backscattered electrons should be abbreviated as BSE)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Claudionico / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the near-atomic resolution claimed by Abbe’s equation at higher accelerating voltages, SEMs struggle to reach beyond nanometer-level resolution, and therefore cannot see individual atoms. There are many variables which cause the reduction in practical resolution, so only major factors are listed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interaction Volume===&lt;br /&gt;
The first limitation is electron interaction volume. When a high energy electron beam strikes the sample, electrons penetrate the sample and knock free other electrons, ballooning into a relatively large interaction volume. The greater the accelerating voltage, the greater the interaction volume—therefore, SEMs must balance the improvement in theoretical Abbe resolution from a higher energy and the decrease in resolution from larger interaction volumes at high accelerating voltages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interaction volume typically has a diameter in the micron range for bulk samples and a diameter in the same order as sample thickness for thin foils used in TEM. This tiny interaction volume is also why extremely thin (&amp;lt;50nm) TEM foils can get down to atomic resolution. For SEM samples, noise and overlapping signals from different areas of a sample will blur an image if the accelerating voltage and interaction volume are too large. Ideally, interaction volume diameter should approximate the size of sample features to get sharp images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aberrations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aberrations occur when a lens fails to converge all rays at a single point and the image becomes out of focus. There are two types of aberrations: spherical and chromatic. In SEM, spherical aberrations occur when electrons near the edges of an electromagnetic lens are bent inconsistently compared to electrons at the center of the lens and fail to converge—this can be fixed by using a smaller aperture. Chromatic aberrations occur when the electron beam is not of uniform energy, causing the electromagnetic lens to bend electrons of differing energies to different points on the focal plane. Both of these phenomena derive their names from the same photon-based effects in optical microscopy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astigmatism===&lt;br /&gt;
Astigmatism in SEM occurs due to fluctuations in magnetic field strength, which may be caused by defects in the electron column core, source contamination, or magnetic samples. This typically results in the blurring or stretching of the SEM image, and can be corrected using stigmation coils. Most SEMs have both an X and Y stigmator knobs for correcting stretching, as well as an auto-stigmation feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Information Provided by SEM Emissions==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEM-EmissionMechanisms.png|350px|thumb|right|SE, BSE, and characteristic X-ray Emissions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© Rob Hurt / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
When primary electrons (PE) from the e-beam inelastically interact with electrons in the sample, they transfer a significant portion of their kinetic energy to another electron, which is then ejected as a secondary electron (SE). Other times, primary electrons can &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; around atomic nuclei and return while only losing a negligible amount of energy. This is an elastic interaction, and the returned primary electrons are redubbed backscattered electrons (BSD). While SE have energies in the 10s of eVs, BSE return with the same initial energy, which varies based on accelerating voltage (10 kV accelerating voltage &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Rightarrow&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; 10 keV of energy). Therefore, SEMs primarily handle 2 detectors used for imaging: these are the secondary electron detector (SED) and the backscattered electron detector (BSD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SED ===&lt;br /&gt;
Secondary electrons give an image which shows &#039;&#039;&#039;topographical&#039;&#039;&#039; features and a relatively large [[#Depth of Field|depth of field]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEs have such low energies, they can only escape when present in the sample&#039;s surface (the top several nm). This also means SEs have low interaction volume, and have resolutions on the nm level. The most common type of SED is the Everhart-Thornley (ET) detector, which are placed off-center from the sample to provide better contrast between SEs coming from different areas on the sample surface in exchange for slightly worse signal-to-noise ratio. The reasoning for sacrificing signal is because SE yields (# of emitted SEs per PE) are over 100%&amp;amp;mdash;this is because high-energy PEs undergoing inelastic interactions can dislodge multiple SEs at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== BSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Backscattered electrons give elemental contrast (Z-contrast), but by using a 4-quadrant detector, some topographical features are also resolvable. Turning off half of a 4-quadrant BSD works similarly to ET SEDs, where one side of sample will appear brighter than the other side. Note that these topographical modes do lose some Z-contrast in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BSEs are very high energy, and therefore penetrate deeper into the sample than SEs. This larger interaction volume results in BSD resolutions in the 100s of nm, 2 orders of magnitude worse than SEDs. Additionally, BSE yields are typically under 50% because they cannot &amp;quot;share&amp;quot; their initial energy and some BSEs become trapped in atomic orbitals. Z-contrast occurs because of increasing nucleus size through the periodic table&amp;amp;mdash;heavier nuclei will more effectively &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; PEs, result in greater counts for heavier atoms and lower counts for lighter atoms. This is typically displayed by making atomically heavier areas of the sample bright and atomically lighter areas of the sample dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, inelastic interactions which dislodge secondary electrons leave an electron vacancy which must be quenched, similar to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. The resulting vacancy is quenched, and the surplus energy is ejected as a secondary characteristic X-ray. Since energy drops between electrons levels in a given atom are discrete and distinct, a detector which can catch these secondary X-rays would be able to determine elemental composition. This is known as energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX), as is very common in SEM systems. Unlike XRF, secondary X-rays are only emitted from a small spot&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is sensitive to interaction volume, which is typically 1-2 μm in diameter for characteristic X-rays, with a spot size of a few nm. For comparison XRF depth ranges from several μm to a few mm, and irradiates the entire sample at once. This makes EDS &#039;&#039;slightly&#039;&#039; more surface sensitive, while XRF is more bulk sensitive. In SEM, rastering the e-beam source across the sample generates an EDS map, which is useful to measue elemental composition of specific surface features such as pores and inclusions, as well as compositional differeneces across grain boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EBSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a characterization technique found in some SEMs which gives detailed crystollographic information typically only available from techniques such as TEM or XRD. EBSD requires a crystalline sample polished to a flat surface to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of diffraction bands and lattice quality. The sample must also be highly tilted (~70º from horizontal) with respect to the diffraction camera (placed perpendicular to the e-beam) to increase diffraction contrast for the camera&#039;s phosphor screen, and the sample must be placed extremely close to the camera to increase signal (low working distance, WD &amp;lt; 5mm for most SEMs). The backscattered electrons which escape at this specific angle must follow the [[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)#Bragg&#039;s Law|Bragg diffraction condition]], resulting signal bands seen on the camera known as &#039;&#039;Kikuchi lines&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Kikuchi bands&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DOF-diagram.png|300px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of Field==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopy, specifically when detecting secondary electrons, has a superior depth of field compared to optical microscopy. Depth of field is a objective measure of the ability of a microscope to simultaneously focus at multiple depth&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is the &amp;quot;acceptable range&amp;quot; of depths where sample features are still in focus. Mathematically, depth of field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, can be approximated by:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\tan{\alpha}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the radius of the viewing spot, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is again the aperture half-angle. This formula can be confirmed upon inspection of the diagram to the right. This small aperture half-angle is what gives SEMs a much better depth of field that optical microscopes, whose aperture half angles are much larger. For SEMs, we can once again use the small-angle approximation to simplify this to:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since depth of field is subjective and based on the image itself, note that this viewing spot is actually the defined by the area on the sample which corresponds to a single pixel of the image. This area can therefore be calculated using the SEM&#039;s field of view, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{FOV}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the pixel width of the image, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{pix}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r=\frac{W_\textrm{FOV}}{W_\textrm{pix}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if given the image&#039;s actual pixel size (a constant diameter), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;P&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can define magnification, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, to be:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M=\frac{P}{2r} \rightarrow 2r=\frac{P}{M}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This shows that the size of the viewing spot depends on image magnification: therefore, magnification also affects the depth of field.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore D=\frac{P}{M\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From this equation, we can see that lowering either the aperture half-angle or the magnification will result in a greater depth of field in SEMs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Working Distance===&lt;br /&gt;
Since magnification cannot be changed if we want to continue to view small features, the aperture can be tweaked through the working distance, or WD. WD is the distance between the bottom pole piece of the objective lens and the specimen. Given the objective aperture radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=\frac{R}{\textrm{WD}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
WD typically falls between 5-9 mm when using secondary electron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Common SEM Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs run into several unavoidable issues which requires users to prepare and analyze samples more carefully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Charging===&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEMs blast a sample with electrons, samples will always charge wil imaging. The polarity of charge depends on the sample, but typically the sample emits more electrons than the number of incident primary electrons due to a SE yield of over 100%. Therefore, the sample becomes slightly positively charged. A charged sample results in several complications for SEM, whether positively or negatively charged. Charged samples will deflect both the primary e-beam at the surface and the emitted electrons. This disturbs focus, depth of field, and contrast, distorts and drifts the image, creates random dark and bright spots/streaks on the image, and in extreme cases, charging can even break parts of the specimen and damage the detector and source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid this, several precautions can be taken during sample prep and during analysis. Firstly, either carbon or copper tape should be used to afix the sample to the sample stub or holder so that the sample is grounded. This allows electrons to freely travel to fill electron-holes in the sample to maintain a neutral charge. Non-conductive samples should be coated with gold nanoparticles (see [[Sputter Coater]]) to make the sample conductive&amp;amp;mdash;this allows topographical features to still be visible, although it will dampen contrast in BSD images and muddle EDS with gold peaks. If BSD or EDS are wanted, the sample should instead be imaged at a low accelerating voltage on the SEM (5kV) and rastering speed should be increased to avoid significant charging at any one spot. Conductive samples simply need to be grounded to the sample stub or holder. For samples mounted in a hot mounting press, use a conductive mounting compound (such as conductive phenolic powders) or afix carbon or copper tape directly onto the sample surface and ground point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Etching===&lt;br /&gt;
When a higher energy e-beam rasters across one region for a prolonged duration, it may &amp;quot;etch&amp;quot; the sample by depositing a thin layer of residue. This residue comes from gases which were not pumped out by the vacuum, namely, hydrocarbons and water. High energy electrons can help water and carbon &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; ot the sample, and upon increasing your field of view in the imaging software, a darkened box may be visible on your sample—this is a sign of etching. This phenomena is especially prevalent at higher magnifications, where the beam continually rasters over an even smaller spot. This is unpreventable, but during analysis, it is recommended to not stay in one place for a long time and to keep moving around. When examining small features that require high magnification, focus on another small feature in the same plane as your feature, then move to your area of interest to avoid etching imporant areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Dangerous&amp;quot; Samples===&lt;br /&gt;
Any sample with loose particles may break under an intense e-beam and damage the detector and source&amp;amp;mdash;samples must be firmly attached to the sample stub or holder. Because lenses in electron microscopes are controlled using precise electromagnetic fields, magnetic samples may permamently damage the objective lens and are therefore not allowed in many SEMs. Porous samples suck as rock and concrete may contain trapped gases which may degas if put under high vacuum in the SEM. These gases may damage the detector and source, so samples should be degassed (and dried) before analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Theory &amp;amp; Techniques==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEM Colorization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Notation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|char]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39322</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39322"/>
		<updated>2025-06-10T14:46:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;infobox&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!|&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |PhenomXL SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomxl-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
! style=&amp;quot;font-size:135%;text-align:center;&amp;quot; |Phenom ProX SEM [[https://sites.gatech.edu/mse-mill/sop/phenomprox-sem/ SOP]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;amp;nbsp;||[[File:PhenomXL.png|center|250px]]||[[File:PhenomProX.png|center|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Magnification Range&#039;&#039;&#039;:||160x to 200,000x||80x to 130,000x&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Accelerating Voltages&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| 4.8 kV to 20.5 kV (advanced mode)|| 5, 10, or 15 kV ||&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Feature Resolution&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| ~10nm || ~14nm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Detectors&#039;&#039;&#039;:||Secondary (SED) &amp;amp; Backscatter (BSD)||Backscatter only&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Capabilities&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| EDS, AIM, 3DRR || EDS&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&#039;&#039;&#039;Sample Dimensions&#039;&#039;&#039;:|| max. 10 cm x 10 cm, 4 cm (h); or 36 stubs || max. 3.2 cm (ø), 3 cm (h)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) rasters an electron beam across a specific area on a sample, allowing for much higher magnifications compared to optical microscopy. The electrons are either elastically or inelastically reflected off the sample, then captured by detector(s) to yield an image.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Electron Microscopy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron and optical microscopy share many fundamental components—specifically, a lens used to focus a specific type of source, and after either reflecting from or transmitting through the sample, a “signal” is then captured by a detector which processes inputs and spits out an image. In optical microscopy, an optical glass lens focuses photons from a lamp into either a digital camera or your eye. In electron microscopy, a series of variable magnetic fields serve as condenser lenses to vary the current and spot size of the electron beam (e-beam) generated from an electron gun. In SEM, this beam is then focused using an electromagnetic objective lens and rastered across the sample by a set of scan coils.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to optical microscopy, electron microscopy also has both reflection and transmission modes—these are two separate imaging techniques known as &#039;&#039;&#039;Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)&#039;&#039;&#039; and  &#039;&#039;&#039;[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Types of Electron Guns ===&lt;br /&gt;
There are 2 main types of electron guns used in electron microscopy: thermionic (Schottky) emission and cold field emission. Both types required an electron source—typically this is either a single crystal of tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride (LaB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), or cerium hexaboride (CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;). Both Phenom SEMs at the MILL use thermionic emission guns with a CeB&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Software Features ===&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Automated Image Mapping (AIM)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEMs will raster beam over a larger area of a sample at a given magnification and automatically stitch the caputured images together.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;3D Roughness Reconstruction (3DRR)&#039;&#039;&#039;: SEM will attempt to focus in a range of depths, then stitch together planes of features which are in focus to generate a 3D image representative of surface topology. This can be exported as an image or .stl file.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Magnification &amp;amp; Resolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs can provide an additional 2 orders of magnitude in magnification and resolution when compared to optical microscopes, which typically max out around 1,000x magnification and 200 nm resolution. SEMs typically have around 100,000x magnification and 2 nm resolution. This additional resolution is governed by the Abbe equation and de Broglie wave equation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Proof ===&lt;br /&gt;
Abbe’s equation defines the theoretical maximum resolution of a microscope, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{k\lambda}{n\sin(\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k = 0.61&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is an empirical constant, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the refractive index, and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the aperture half-angle. The term in the denominator, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\sin{\alpha)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, is also known as the &#039;&#039;numerical aperture&#039;&#039;, or nA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In optical microscopy, Abbe’s equation simplifies to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{nA}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where the numerical aperture at high magnifications typically levels out at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;nA \approx 1.35&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Plugging in the &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for green light gives:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\cdot500\textrm{nm}}{1.35}=226\textnormal{nm}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In electron microscopy, the refractive index is typically 1, since the chamber is pumped down to near-vacuum conditions, and the aperture half-angle is typically very small. Using the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-angle_approximation small-angle approximation], we can simplify Abbe’s equation to &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\delta=\frac{0.61\lambda}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since electron microscopy uses an electron beam to image the sample, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is now the de Broglie wavelength of an electron. The de Broglie wave equation states:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\lambda=\frac{h}{p}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;h&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is Planck’s constant and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is momentum. Recall that kinetic energy is defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore p=mv=\sqrt{2m(\textrm{KE})}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopes such as SEMs typically have a controllable accelerating voltage—this term affects the kinetic energy of the e-beam by the fundamental relation: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\textrm{KE} = e\textrm{V}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the elementary charge. Plugging in for momentum and kinetic energy, we get:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore \lambda=\frac{h}{\sqrt{2me\textrm{V}}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, by plugging in all constants and assuming a small aperture half-angle of 0.01 rad (must use radians for small-angle approximation), the following resolutions can be obtained for varying accelerating voltages. Note that these calculations use Newtonian equations, not Einsteinian (relativistic) equations.&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Accelerating Voltage (kV) !! de Broglie Wavelength (nm) !! Abbe Resolution (nm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5 || .0173 || 1.06&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10 || .0123 || .751&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 15 || .0100 || .613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 100 || .00388 pm || .237&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Limitations ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ElectronInteractionVolume.png|thumb|350px|right|Electron Interaction Volume with Matter (note: backscattered electrons should be abbreviated as BSE)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© User:Claudionico / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the near-atomic resolution claimed by Abbe’s equation at higher accelerating voltages, SEMs struggle to reach beyond nanometer-level resolution, and therefore cannot see individual atoms. There are many variables which cause the reduction in practical resolution, so only major factors are listed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Interaction Volume===&lt;br /&gt;
The first limitation is electron interaction volume. When a high energy electron beam strikes the sample, electrons penetrate the sample and knock free other electrons, ballooning into a relatively large interaction volume. The greater the accelerating voltage, the greater the interaction volume—therefore, SEMs must balance the improvement in theoretical Abbe resolution from a higher energy and the decrease in resolution from larger interaction volumes at high accelerating voltages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interaction volume typically has a diameter in the micron range for bulk samples and a diameter in the same order as sample thickness for thin foils used in TEM. This tiny interaction volume is also why extremely thin (&amp;lt;50nm) TEM foils can get down to atomic resolution. For SEM samples, noise and overlapping signals from different areas of a sample will blur an image if the accelerating voltage and interaction volume are too large. Ideally, interaction volume diameter should approximate the size of sample features to get sharp images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aberrations ===&lt;br /&gt;
Aberrations occur when a lens fails to converge all rays at a single point and the image becomes out of focus. There are two types of aberrations: spherical and chromatic. In SEM, spherical aberrations occur when electrons near the edges of an electromagnetic lens are bent inconsistently compared to electrons at the center of the lens and fail to converge—this can be fixed by using a smaller aperture. Chromatic aberrations occur when the electron beam is not of uniform energy, causing the electromagnetic lens to bend electrons of differing energies to different points on the focal plane. Both of these phenomena derive their names from the same photon-based effects in optical microscopy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Astigmatism===&lt;br /&gt;
Astigmatism in SEM occurs due to fluctuations in magnetic field strength, which may be caused by defects in the electron column core, source contamination, or magnetic samples. This typically results in the blurring or stretching of the SEM image, and can be corrected using stigmation coils. Most SEMs have both an X and Y stigmator knobs for correcting stretching, as well as an auto-stigmation feature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Information Provided by SEM Emissions==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SEM-EmissionMechanisms.png|350px|thumb|right|SE, BSE, and characteristic X-ray Emissions&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;© Rob Hurt / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0]]&lt;br /&gt;
When primary electrons (PE) from the e-beam inelastically interact with electrons in the sample, they transfer a significant portion of their kinetic energy to another electron, which is then ejected as a secondary electron (SE). Other times, primary electrons can &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; around atomic nuclei and return while only losing a negligible amount of energy. This is an elastic interaction, and the returned primary electrons are redubbed backscattered electrons (BSD). While SE have energies in the 10s of eVs, BSE return with the same initial energy, which varies based on accelerating voltage (10 kV accelerating voltage &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Rightarrow&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; 10 keV of energy). Therefore, SEMs primarily handle 2 detectors used for imaging: these are the secondary electron detector (SED) and the backscattered electron detector (BSD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== SED ===&lt;br /&gt;
Secondary electrons give an image which shows &#039;&#039;&#039;topographical&#039;&#039;&#039; features and a relatively large [[#Depth of Field|depth of field]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEs have such low energies, they can only escape when present in the sample&#039;s surface (the top several nm). This also means SEs have low interaction volume, and have resolutions on the nm level. The most common type of SED is the Everhart-Thornley (ET) detector, which are placed off-center from the sample to provide better contrast between SEs coming from different areas on the sample surface in exchange for slightly worse signal-to-noise ratio. The reasoning for sacrificing signal is because SE yields (# of emitted SEs per PE) are over 100%&amp;amp;mdash;this is because high-energy PEs undergoing inelastic interactions can dislodge multiple SEs at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== BSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Backscattered electrons give elemental contrast (Z-contrast), but by using a 4-quadrant detector, some topographical features are also resolvable. Turning off half of a 4-quadrant BSD works similarly to ET SEDs, where one side of sample will appear brighter than the other side. Note that these topographical modes do lose some Z-contrast in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BSEs are very high energy, and therefore penetrate deeper into the sample than SEs. This larger interaction volume results in BSD resolutions in the 100s of nm, 2 orders of magnitude worse than SEDs. Additionally, BSE yields are typically under 50% because they cannot &amp;quot;share&amp;quot; their initial energy and some BSEs become trapped in atomic orbitals. Z-contrast occurs because of increasing nucleus size through the periodic table&amp;amp;mdash;heavier nuclei will more effectively &amp;quot;slingshot&amp;quot; PEs, result in greater counts for heavier atoms and lower counts for lighter atoms. This is typically displayed by making atomically heavier areas of the sample bright and atomically lighter areas of the sample dark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EDS ===&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, inelastic interactions which dislodge secondary electrons leave an electron vacancy which must be quenched, similar to &#039;&#039;&#039;[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF) | X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF)]]&#039;&#039;&#039;. The resulting vacancy is quenched, and the surplus energy is ejected as a secondary characteristic X-ray. Since energy drops between electrons levels in a given atom are discrete and distinct, a detector which can catch these secondary X-rays would be able to determine elemental composition. This is known as energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS/EDX), as is very common in SEM systems. Unlike XRF, secondary X-rays are only emitted from a small spot&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is sensitive to interaction volume, which is typically 1-2 μm in diameter for characteristic X-rays, with a spot size of a few nm. For comparison XRF depth ranges from several μm to a few mm, and irradiates the entire sample at once. This makes EDS &#039;&#039;slightly&#039;&#039; more surface sensitive, while XRF is more bulk sensitive. In SEM, rastering the e-beam source across the sample generates an EDS map, which is useful to measue elemental composition of specific surface features such as pores and inclusions, as well as compositional differeneces across grain boundaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== EBSD ===&lt;br /&gt;
Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) is a characterization technique found in some SEMs which gives detailed crystollographic information typically only available from techniques such as TEM or XRD. EBSD requires a crystalline sample polished to a flat surface to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of diffraction bands and lattice quality. The sample must also be highly tilted (~70º from horizontal) with respect to the diffraction camera (placed perpendicular to the e-beam) to increase diffraction contrast for the camera&#039;s phosphor screen, and the sample must be placed extremely close to the camera to increase signal (low working distance, WD &amp;lt; 5mm for most SEMs). The backscattered electrons which escape at this specific angle must follow the [[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)#Bragg&#039;s Law|Bragg diffraction condition]], resulting signal bands seen on the camera known as &#039;&#039;Kikuchi lines&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;Kikuchi bands&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DOF-diagram.png|300px|thumb|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Depth of Field==&lt;br /&gt;
Electron microscopy, specifically when detecting secondary electrons, has a superior depth of field compared to optical microscopy. Depth of field is a objective measure of the ability of a microscope to simultaneously focus at multiple depth&amp;amp;mdash;more specifically, it is the &amp;quot;acceptable range&amp;quot; of depths where sample features are still in focus. Mathematically, depth of field, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, can be approximated by:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\tan{\alpha}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the radius of the viewing spot, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is again the aperture half-angle. This formula can be confirmed upon inspection of the diagram to the right. This small aperture half-angle is what gives SEMs a much better depth of field that optical microscopes, whose aperture half angles are much larger. For SEMs, we can once again use the small-angle approximation to simplify this to:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D=\frac{2r}{\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since depth of field is subjective and based on the image itself, note that this viewing spot is actually the defined by the area on the sample which corresponds to a single pixel of the image. This area can therefore be calculated using the SEM&#039;s field of view, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{FOV}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the pixel width of the image, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;W_\textrm{pix}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2r=\frac{W_\textrm{FOV}}{W_\textrm{pix}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, if given the image&#039;s actual pixel size (a constant diameter), &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;P&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we can define magnification, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, to be:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M=\frac{P}{2r} \rightarrow 2r=\frac{P}{M}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This shows that the size of the viewing spot depends on image magnification: therefore, magnification also affects the depth of field.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\therefore D=\frac{P}{M\alpha}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From this equation, we can see that lowering either the aperture half-angle or the magnification will result in a greater depth of field in SEMs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Working Distance===&lt;br /&gt;
Since magnification cannot be changed if we want to continue to view small features, the aperture can be tweaked through the working distance, or WD. WD is the distance between the bottom pole piece of the objective lens and the specimen. Given the objective aperture radius &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;R&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be defined as:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha=\frac{R}{\textrm{WD}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
WD typically falls between 5-9 mm when using secondary electron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Common SEM Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
SEMs run into several unavoidable issues which requires users to prepare and analyze samples more carefully.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Charging===&lt;br /&gt;
Since SEMs blast a sample with electrons, samples will always charge wil imaging. The polarity of charge depends on the sample, but typically the sample emits more electrons than the number of incident primary electrons due to a SE yield of over 100%. Therefore, the sample becomes slightly positively charged. A charged sample results in several complications for SEM, whether positively or negatively charged. Charged samples will deflect both the primary e-beam at the surface and the emitted electrons. This disturbs focus, depth of field, and contrast, distorts and drifts the image, creates random dark and bright spots/streaks on the image, and in extreme cases, charging can even break parts of the specimen and damage the detector and source.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To avoid this, several precautions can be taken during sample prep and during analysis. Firstly, either carbon or copper tape should be used to afix the sample to the sample stub or holder so that the sample is grounded. This allows electrons to freely travel to fill electron-holes in the sample to maintain a neutral charge. Non-conductive samples should be coated with gold nanoparticles (see [[Sputter Coater]]) to make the sample conductive&amp;amp;mdash;this allows topographical features to still be visible, although it will dampen contrast in BSD images and muddle EDS with gold peaks. If BSD or EDS are wanted, the sample should instead be imaged at a low accelerating voltage on the SEM (5kV) and rastering speed should be increased to avoid significant charging at any one spot. Conductive samples simply need to be grounded to the sample stub or holder. For samples mounted in a hot mounting press, use a conductive mounting compound (such as conductive phenolic powders) or afix carbon or copper tape directly onto the sample surface and ground point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sample Etching===&lt;br /&gt;
When a higher energy e-beam rasters across one region for a prolonged duration, it may &amp;quot;etch&amp;quot; the sample by depositing a thin layer of residue. This residue comes from gases which were not pumped out by the vacuum, namely, hydrocarbons and water. High energy electrons can help water and carbon &amp;quot;stick&amp;quot; ot the sample, and upon increasing your field of view in the imaging software, a darkened box may be visible on your sample—this is a sign of etching. This phenomena is especially prevalent at higher magnifications, where the beam continually rasters over an even smaller spot. This is unpreventable, but during analysis, it is recommended to not stay in one place for a long time and to keep moving around. When examining small features that require high magnification, focus on another small feature in the same plane as your feature, then move to your area of interest to avoid etching imporant areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Dangerous&amp;quot; Samples===&lt;br /&gt;
Any sample with loose particles may break under an intense e-beam and damage the detector and source&amp;amp;mdash;samples must be firmly attached to the sample stub or holder. Because lenses in electron microscopes are controlled using precise electromagnetic fields, magnetic samples may permamently damage the objective lens and are therefore not allowed in many SEMs. Porous samples suck as rock and concrete may contain trapped gases which may degas if put under high vacuum in the SEM. These gases may damage the detector and source, so samples should be degassed (and dried) before analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Theory &amp;amp; Techniques==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sputter Coater]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEM Colorization]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Optical Microscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer (XRF)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[X-ray Notation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Equipment|char]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39321</id>
		<title>Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://millwiki.mse.gatech.edu/index.php?title=Scanning_Electron_Microscopy&amp;diff=39321"/>
		<updated>2025-06-10T14:45:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mjimenez47: Replaced content with &amp;quot;test&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;test&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Mjimenez47</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>